Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:03]

IN BUSINESS MEETING TO ORDER.

OKAY. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STAND AND JOIN US FOR INVOCATION AND PLEDGE. OUR HEAVENLY FATHER, WE THANK THEE FOR THIS DAY THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN AND ALL THE MANY BLESSINGS BESTOWED UPON US.

PLEASE GUIDE US AS WE HEAR THE CASES THAT COME BEFORE US TONIGHT.

WE PRAY FOR PEACE IN OUR COUNTRY AND FOR THOSE SERVING AND PROTECTING US AT HOME AND ABROAD.

WE PRAY FOR OUR ATTENDEES AND THEIR SAFE TRAVELS HOME TONIGHT.

IN JESUS NAME, AMEN.

. ALL RIGHT.

OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS TONIGHT IS ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING.

[ADOPTION OF AGENDA]

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO THE AGENDA.

BE ADOPTED AS WRITTEN.

SECOND.

ALL RIGHT. THIS IS THE TIME IN WHICH WE HAVE OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS.

IF THE ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSIONERS ON ANY TOPICS THAT ARE NOT A PART OF OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR LAST, YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.

SEE? AND THERE'S NO ONE COMING FORWARD.

WE CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.

ARE THERE ANY COMMISSIONER COMMENTS THAT ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THIS?

[COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS]

I GUESS JUST THAT AUGUST 6TH IS NATIONAL NIGHT OUT.

I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF EVENTS AROUND PRINCE GEORGE, SO A LOT OF THE SUBDIVISIONS HAVE IT.

WHAT ELSE? OKAY, SO MOVING ON TO THE FUTURE ORDER OF BUSINESS.

[ORDER OF BUSINESS]

WE HAVE ADOPTION OF THE WORK SESSION MEETINGS FROM JUNE THE 24TH.

MOTION. WE ADOPT THE WORK SESSION MEETINGS FROM JUNE 24TH, 2024.

SECOND.

YES. NEXT IS ADOPTION OF THE BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES FROM THURSDAY, JUNE THE 27TH.

MOTION. WE ADOPT THE BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES FROM JUNE 27TH, 2024.

SECOND.

WE'LL NOW OPEN OUR PUBLIC HEARING PORTION.

[PUBLIC HEARINGS]

TIM, IF YOU'LL COME UP AND WE'LL BE GOING OVER FIRST THE REZONING OF RZ-24-03.

ALRIGHT. MAKING MY WAY THERE.

YES. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR ANDERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

THE FIRST ITEM IS RZ-24-03.

THIS IS UNDER TAB FOUR IN YOUR PACKET.

PACKET IS ALSO POSTED ONLINE ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECTION.

SO THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE 1.4 ACRES APPROXIMATELY FROM LIMITED RESIDENTIAL R1 AND GENERAL BUSINESS B1 TO JUST BE ONE.

THE PURPOSE OF THIS REZONING IS TO REMOVE THE EXISTING PROFFERS ON A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY AND PREPARE THE WHOLE PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 12106 SOUTH CRATER ROAD.

WE'VE PROVIDED A TAX MAP NUMBER, AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES THE PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.

YOU'VE GOT A LOCATION MAP IN THE COUNTY.

TOP RIGHT PART OF THE SCREEN SHOWS A MAP OF THE COUNTY, AND THIS IS IN THE SOUTHWEST PORTION NEAR INTERSTATE 95 AT.

[00:05:05]

I THINK THIS IS EXIT 45 AND THE PROPERTY IS OUTLINED IN THE BLUE LINE.

THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW.

CLOSER IN YOU CAN SEE THERE'S AN EXISTING DWELLING ON THE PROPERTY.

IT'S ACROSS FROM A THE STEPHEN KENT PROPERTY.

THERE'S SO BASICALLY THERE'S HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS IN THIS AREA ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD, ON THE ZONING MAP, YOU CAN SEE THE CURRENT STATE WHERE THERE ARE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS ON THE PROPERTY.

A PORTION OF IT IS ZONED R1 AND A PORTION OF IT IS ZONED B1.

THE REASON FOR THIS IS THERE WERE AT LEAST TWO SEPARATE ZONING CASES IN THE PAST THAT ESTABLISHED THE B1 ZONING ON PIECES OF THIS PROPERTY, AND THE PROPERTY LINES HAVE BEEN CHANGED OVER TIME AND THAT'S THUS WE HAVE THE SITUATION THAT YOU SEE TODAY.

FUTURE LAND USE MAP CALLS FOR RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL USE OF THIS PROPERTY.

THE SUMMARY AS WE MENTIONED, THEY WANT TO REZONE FROM TWO DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS TO JUST ONE AND RESCIND THE EXISTING PROFFERS.

THOSE EXISTING PROFFERS AFFECT A PORTION IS JUST ONE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.

THE GOALS OF THE APPLICANT OR THE PROPERTY OWNER ARE TO ESTABLISH UNIFORM B1 ZONING SO THAT THEY CAN DEVELOP IT FOR COMMERCIAL USE IN THE FUTURE. THERE WERE NO PROFFERS SUBMITTED FOR THIS.

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS.

WE HAVE SOME INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS, INCLUDING THAT IF THIS PROPERTY IS REZONED, IT CAN BE USED FOR ALL BY RIGHT USES IN THE B1 ZONING DISTRICT OR ANY OF THE BY RIGHT USES IN THE IN THAT ZONING DISTRICT.

IT COULD ALSO POTENTIALLY BE DEVELOPED AS A LARGER PROPERTY WHEN COMBINED WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES WHICH ARE UNDER OR NOT DEVELOPED AT THIS TIME. THE A SITE PLAN REVIEW WOULD BE REQUIRED BEFORE IT COULD BE DEVELOPED WITH ANY COMMERCIAL USE AND THAT TYPE OF REVIEW WOULD ALLOW TIME TO REVIEW CODE REQUIREMENTS THAT APPLY TO DEVELOPING BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY AND THAT WOULD ALSO AFFECT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW POTENTIAL TRAFFIC IMPACTS.

DEPENDING ON WHAT IS PROPOSED, AS THEY'LL HAVE DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS BASED ON THE TYPE OF ENTRANCE THAT'S NEEDED FOR WHAT THEY'RE BUILDING.

PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED THIS TO DETERMINE IF, IN STAFF'S OPINION, IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDING ZONING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES, AND FOUND THAT IT APPEARS TO BE YES, FOR ALL OF THOSE AND THE ANTICIPATED OFF SITE IMPACTS ARE UNKNOWN BECAUSE THERE'S NO SINGLE USE PROPOSED AT THIS TIME.

SO OFF SITE IMPACTS WOULD WOULD VARY DEPENDING ON WHAT IS ULTIMATELY DEVELOPED ON THIS PROPERTY.

OF COURSE, THERE'S MORE STAFF COMMENTS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES THAT REVIEWED THIS ONLY VDOT HAD COMMENTS ON TO TO CONSIDER AT THIS MOMENT. THEY JUST NOTED THAT NO CONCEPTUAL PLAN OR PROPOSED USE WAS PROVIDED SO A TRAFFIC IMPACTS COULD NOT BE PREDICTED.

I MENTIONED THAT EARLIER IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS, AND THEY NOTED THAT TURN LANES WOULD WOULD BE REQUIRED ONLY IF WARRANTED BASED ON WHAT WOULD ACTUALLY BE PROPOSED DURING A SITE PLAN.

SO THAT'S BASICALLY A TO BE DETERMINED LATER KIND OF THING AND PROPERTY.

THEY ALSO NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY COULD BE DEVELOPED JOINTLY WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES, SO YOU COULD END UP WITH A BIGGER TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THERE IF ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE INVOLVED. BUT THIS B1 ZONING WOULD BRING THE ZONING IN LINE WITH WHAT'S ALREADY ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

THERE WERE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS PRIOR TO TONIGHT AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL AND WE'VE PROVIDED THE CRITERIA THAT WE USE TO GET THERE, MOST OF WHICH I HAVE GONE OVER EARLIER IN THE PRESENTATION.

WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANT.

DEAN HAWKINS IS HERE ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.

SO IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS WELL, YOU YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ALLOW HIM TO COME UP AND JUST INTRODUCE HIMSELF HERE.

BUT AFTER YOU HEAR FROM HIM, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT, YOU CAN ASK WHOEVER YOU'D LIKE TO BE AT THE PODIUM TO SPEAK TO YOU.

COULD YOU COME UP AND JUST SAY HELLO OR ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD? GOOD EVENING. I'M DEAN HAWKINS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE PROJECT AND THE APPLICANT.

AS ALWAYS, TIM GRAVES DOES A GOOD JOB.

I DON'T NEED TO SAY MUCH OTHER THAN TO SAY THIS IS JUST A LITTLE BIT OF HOUSEKEEPING ON THIS PARCEL WHERE IT SPLIT ZONE CURRENTLY, AND WE'RE LOOKING TO MAKE IT INTO

[00:10:10]

ONE ZONING DISTRICT THAT WE CAN CONSIDER, AS WELL AS THE POTENTIAL OF COMBINING IT WITH THESE OTHER PARCELS.

I'VE WORKED IN THIS AREA FOR A LONG TIME, AND THE REAL PROBLEM THAT WE'VE ENCOUNTERED IS THAT ALL THESE PARCELS ARE SO SMALL THAT WE RUN INTO A LOT OF CONFLICTS WITH VDOT AS FAR AS WHAT THEY WOULD REQUIRE, AND NO ONE PARCEL CAN SEEM TO MEET THESE ISSUES.

SO BY COMING TOGETHER AND WORKING OUT A MASTER PLAN, WHENEVER THAT COMES ABOUT, I THINK WE CAN SOLVE THESE ISSUES.

SO WITH THAT, I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ARE THERE ANY FINAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF BY COMMISSIONERS? NO. ALL RIGHT.

WE'LL NOW OPEN THIS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WE'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES FOR ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK TO THE COMMISSIONERS REGARDING THIS REQUEST.

BEING NO ONE COMING FORWARD.

WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM.

COMMISSIONERS, IT'S NOW WITH YOU FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AND A MOTION AS TO HOW YOU'D LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.

I MOVE YOU FORWARD.[INAUDIBLE] . SECOND.

ALL RIGHT. OUR NEXT CASE.

REZONING RZ-24-04.

OKAY. THIS ONE'S UNDER TAB FIVE IN YOUR PACKET AND THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE ABOUT ONE AND A QUARTER ACRE FROM RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL RA.

ALSO IT'S PARTLY ZONED R2 LIMITED RESIDENTIAL AND ALSO A LITTLE BIT ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS AND YOU'LL SEE A ZONING MAP IN A MINUTE TO SEE WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE AND THE GOAL IS TO REZONE IT TO JUST GENERAL BUSINESS.

THE PURPOSE IS TO USE THE PROPERTY FOR A BUSINESS OFFICE.

SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 5614 RUFFIN ROAD, AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES THE PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR COMMERCIAL USE.

YOU CAN SEE A LOCATION MAP.

IT'S NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF COURTHOUSE, WHICH BECOMES RUFFIN ROAD AND PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE.

THERE'S THE AERIAL VIEW THAT THE.

YOU CAN SEE AN ADDRESS ON TOP OF A BUILDING.

THAT'S THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT'S THERE.

THE WHITE THING IS A TRAILER THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED.

AFTER THIS AERIAL VIEW IS TAKEN, YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A STREAM THAT CROSSES THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.

IT'S OTHERWISE COVERED IN TREES OR IS AN OPEN AREA AROUND THAT BUILDING AND THERE IS A DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE AND A LITTLE PARKING AREA THAT'S BEEN ESTABLISHED AND YOU'LL SEE A PHOTO OF THAT IN A MINUTE.

THERE'S THE ZONING MAP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW THERE'S THREE COLORS ON THERE.

SO THERE'S THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS AFFECTING DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THAT PROPERTY.

SO THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT TO USE IN DEVELOPMENT AND REUSE AND DEVELOP.

THE CURRENT THE USE THAT THE OWNER WANTS TO HAVE ON THERE IS A BUSINESS OFFICE AND YOU CAN SEE IT'S NOT REALLY ZONED FOR THAT RIGHT NOW EXCEPT FOR A LITTLE PIECE OF IT.

SO THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT'S NOT CAN'T BE USED FOR THAT AT THE MOMENT AND THUS THE REQUEST TO REZONE IT.

THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

IT'S ALL RED BECAUSE IT'S ALL PLANNED FOR COMMERCIAL IN THIS AREA.

THERE'S A PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY.

YOU CAN SEE THE ENTRANCE AND A LITTLE PARKING AREA AND THE EXISTING BUILDING.

SO THE PRIMARY GOAL AGAIN IS USE THE EXISTING BUILDING AS A BUSINESS OFFICE FOR A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

IT'S ABOUT 900 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.

BEEN THERE FOR DECADES.

IT HAS AN EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC AND THERE'S EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREA.

[00:15:02]

THERE'S BEEN NO PROFFERS SUBMITTED FOR THIS.

INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS.

THERE'S NO KNOWN PRIOR ZONING CASES, SO THERE'S NO KNOWN PROFFERS AFFECTING THIS.

NO SPECIAL RULES. BASICALLY.

IF IT'S REZONED, IT COULD BE USED FOR ANY OF THE BY RIGHT USES IN THE B1 ZONING DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED USES OFFICE, WHICH WOULD BE ALLOWED THEIR REVIEW COMMENTS BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF.

WE BELIEVE IT APPEARS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDING ZONING AND THE SURROUNDING LAND USES.

THE ANTICIPATED OFFSET IMPACTS WOULD BE LOW SINCE IT'S A SMALL PROPERTY AND FOR AN OFFICE TYPE, USE IT LOW AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF THERE, JUST, YOU KNOW, A CLIENT OR TWO AT A TIME OR MAYBE JUST THE OWNER ON IT MOST OF THE DAY TO DAY BASIS AND IF IT WERE CHANGED IN THE FUTURE TO A DIFFERENT TYPE OF USE, WELL, THAT WOULD THE IMPACTS WOULD DEPEND ON THAT.

WHAT IS THERE? BUT THERE IT IS CONSTRAINED BY THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY.

WE DIDN'T REALLY HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES THAT ANY THAT REQUIRE ANY ACTION AND PUBLIC COMMENTS.

THERE WERE NONE.

STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON THIS IS APPROVAL, AND WE HAD THE CRITERIA THAT WE WENT THROUGH AGAIN, WHICH WAS COVERED.

SO AT THIS TIME, YOU COULD HOLD YOU COULD HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR EITHER OF US YOU CAN ASK THEM.

COME ON UP. OKAY.

HEY, THERE.

MY NAME IS JUSTIN NOBLIN.

I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.

THE REASON THAT I'M ASKING FOR THE REZONING I'VE BEEN A HOME BUSINESS FOR THE PAST DECADE.

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND OVER THAT TEN YEARS, VIRTUALLY ALL OF MY BUSINESS HAS BEEN IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY.

I HAVEN'T HAD ANY BUSINESS HERE OTHER THAN JUST RECORDING MY BUSINESS LICENSE EACH YEAR.

I WOULD LIKE TO VENTURE MORE TOWARDS THE RETAIL THE MAJORITY OF MY WORK HAS BEEN NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR SOME OF THE BIG BUILDERS UP ON THE HULL STREET AREA AND I'M WANTING TO SWITCH OVER MORE TOWARDS LOCAL AND RETAIL WORK, SO I'D LIKE TO HAVE MY OFFICE OVER THERE. FOR ANY CLIENTS THAT THAT DO COME IN.

I AM A CLASS A LICENSED BUILDER RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AND I'D LIKE IF I HAVE ANY LOCAL BUSINESS FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO COME TO AN OFFICE TO MEET AND DISCUSS OPTIONS AND PLANS VERSUS OUR FARM.

SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR.

IT'S A 900 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.

IT'S GOT A SIMPLE BATHROOM IN IT, AN OFFICE, AND ABOUT 600FT² FOR A CONFERENCE TABLE AND SOME DISPLAYS OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTS THAT WE USE AND ADVERTISE.

OTHER THAN THAT, THAT'S ALL I'M REALLY LOOKING FOR.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR SHARING WITH US.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE IS YOU SAY IT'S 1.25 ACRES, BUT YOU DON'T HAVE A PLAT, RIGHT.

THERE WAS AN EXISTING PLOT WITH THE COUNTY AND DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR LAND POINTS ARE, OR ARE YOU JUST.

YES. WELL, IT'S THE AGE OF THE CROP FIELD AND I NORMALLY DON'T VENTURE OVER THE CREEK.

THE CREEK SERVES AS A BUFFER ON ONE SIDE.

I DO OWN A PORTION OF THAT ON THE OTHER SIDE AND IF I EVER DECIDED TO CLEAR THE UNDERBRUSH AND TRY TO UTILIZE THAT, I WOULD HAVE TO GET A SURVEY DONE TO FIND OUT THE EXACT PROPERTY LINES.

THAT'S OWNED BY TOUCHSTONE BANK ON THAT SIDE.

BUT AS IT STANDS ON THE EAST SIDE, IT'S A CORN FIELD AND THE CORN DICTATES THE LINE PRETTY WELL. THAT'S BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR I BELIEVE, SEVERAL DECADES.

MY ONLY, LIKE, LOT OF TIMES, LIKE YOU SAID, TOUCHSTONE BANK OWNS IT.

WELL, THEY HAVE A PLAT THAT SAYS SO MANY ACRES AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE A PLAT WHEN THEY COME IN AND MEASURE THEIR ACREAGE, THEY'RE GOING TO ADJUST THEIR BOUNDARY TO GET THEIR AMOUNT OF ACRES.

I MEAN, YOU COULD PROBABLY RUN INTO A DISPUTE IN THE FUTURE WITH THAT WITHOUT HAVING A FLAT.

RIGHT. I WOULD LEAVE THAT TO THE SURVEY GROUP THAT WOULD DETERMINE THAT.

[00:20:05]

I MEAN, THAT'S, YOU KNOW, IF THERE EVER IS A DISPUTE, IT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH A SURVEY GROUP AND THEY WOULD DETERMINE THE PROPERTY LINES.

I MEAN, IT'S ALL MARKED EXACTLY WHAT THE COORDINATES ARE ON EACH CORNER AND THE DISTANCE BETWEEN EACH OF THEM, THAT'S ESTABLISHED YOU KNOW, AND THAT'S AT THE, AT THE COUNTY OFFICES OR THAT'S AT THE CLERK'S OFFICE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER FINAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

WE'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE TIME NOW FOR PUBLIC HEARING.

IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME AND SPEAK TO THE COMMISSIONERS ON THIS TOPIC, PLEASE COME FORWARD.

SEEING NO ONE COMING FORWARD, WE CAN GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT.

ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME, I NEED TO PLANNING COMMISSIONER RECOMMENDATIONS OR A MOTION.

MADAM CHAIR, I MOVED TO FORWARD REQUEST RZ-24-04 TO THE BOARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL AND THE REASON FOR THIS RECOMMENDATION IS IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING DISTRICTS.

SECOND.

ALL RIGHT.

OUR FINAL PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT IS FOR REZONING CASE NUMBER RZ-24-05.

ALL RIGHT, SO THIS ONE'S UNDER TAB SIX AND THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE A LARGER PROPERTY THAN THE LAST TWO.

IT'S ABOUT 30 ACRES FROM B1 TO R2.

R2 IS A LIMITED RESIDENTIAL, AND THE PURPOSE OF THE REZONING IS TO CORRECT AN APPARENT MAPPING ERROR THAT OCCURRED WITH THE ADOPTION OF THE ZONING MAP IN 2010.

SO IN THIS CASE, THE APPLICANT IS PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY.

THE BOARD INITIATED THIS REZONING REQUEST.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ACROSS FROM 4101 COURTHOUSE ROAD.

WE HAVE A TAX MAP NUMBER THAT WE'VE PROVIDED, AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES IT'S PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.

YOU HAVE A LOCATION MAP, PROPERTIES OUTLINED IN RED AND TRIANGLE OUTLINE IN BLUE.

IT'S IN A TRIANGULAR SHAPE ON THE BORDER WITH THE CITY OF PETERSBURG, AND IT'S ACROSS FROM THE FORMER WALTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

THERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW CLOSER UP.

A GOOD PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY IS SWAMP OR WETLANDS.

THE MAIN DEVELOPABLE PART OF THE PROPERTY, AGAIN, THE MAIN DEVELOPABLE PART, NOT ALL OF IT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE FORMER WALTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROPERTY.

THIS IS ALSO ACROSS FROM TRACTOR SUPPLY.

ON THE ZONING MAP THAT IS ON ON THE COUNTY'S CURRENT ZONING MAP, IT'S SHOWN AS B1.

YOU CAN SEE THE SURROUNDING ZONING OF R2 IS ORANGE RA RESIDENTIAL.

AGRICULTURAL IS THE TAN OR LIGHT COLOR? B1 IS THE RED COLOR AND ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, IT'S PLANNED FOR RESIDENTIAL.

SO THE COUNTIES REQUEST AND IT'S I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE UNCOMMON TO VIEW THIS NORMALLY THESE ARE COMING FROM A PROPERTY OWNER, BUT IN THIS CASE THE BOARD INITIATED THIS BASED ON THE BACKGROUND BASICALLY BEING THERE'S A PARENT, THERE'S AN APPARENT DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY ON THE 1965 ZONING MAP, WHICH WAS R2 RESIDENT, LIMITED RESIDENTIAL, AND ON THE 2010 ZONING MAP, WHICH SHOWS IT AS B1 AND STAFF WAS UNABLE TO FIND ANY RECORDS THAT INDICATE THAT THE PROPERTY WAS EVER REZONED TO BUSINESS.

SO WE'VE CONCLUDED THAT IT WAS AN ERROR AND COMMUNICATED THIS TO THE BOARD AND THEN THE BOARD INITIATED THIS REZONING TO RETURN IT TO ITS FORMER STATE.

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT.

DEPARTMENT NOTED THAT IF THE PROPERTY IS REZONED BACK TO R2, THEN IT CAN BE USED FOR ALL BY RIGHT USES IN THE R2 ZONING DISTRICT.

THE PROPERTY OWNER INDICATED THAT THEY PLAN TO DEVELOP IT WITH RESIDENTIAL HOUSING.

SO THIS WOULD ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN.

[00:25:04]

A SUBDIVISION PLAT AND POTENTIALLY A SITE PLAN WOULD NEED TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE OWNER AT OR DEVELOPER TO BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY REQUIREMENTS AND THE REVIEW COMMENTS FROM STAFF TREATING THIS JUST LIKE ANY OTHER ZONING CASE, FIND THAT IT APPEARS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDING ZONING, AND THE CURRENT SURROUNDING LAND USES.

THE ANTICIPATED OFF SITE IMPACTS ARE UNKNOWN OTHER THAN YOU CAN EXPECT RESIDENTIAL TYPE IMPACTS, SO PROBABLY LIMITED TO JUST TRAFFIC TO AND FROM HOUSES.

IN ALL LIKELIHOOD.

NO COMMENTS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES DURING THIS REVIEW.

NO PUBLIC COMMENTS AND SO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.

CAN I ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

ALL RIGHT. NOW OPEN THIS FOR PUBLIC HEARING.

IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK ON THIS MATTER, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.

NO ONE'S COMING FORWARD.

WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT'S NOW UP FOR COMMISSIONER.

RECOMMENDATION IS MOTION.

I MOVE TO FORWARD REQUEST RZ 24-05 TO THE BOARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL AND THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST IS IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING DISTRICTS.

ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY COMMUNICATIONS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE, TIM?

[COMMUNICATIONS]

YES, I DO HAVE A FEW COMMUNICATIONS.

SO GOING THROUGH WHAT WE HAVE IN THE AGENDA ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, THERE WERE KNOWN NONE.

THE AUGUST MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELED BECAUSE THERE WERE NO APPLICATIONS BY THE DEADLINE AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, WE HAVE PROVIDED SOME RECAPS OR MAYBE JUST ONE RECAP, BECAUSE THERE WAS ONE BOARD MEETING IN JULY AND THE ITEMS THAT ARE, YOU KNOW, FOR YOUR ATTENTION ARE COLORED IN BLUE TEXT, AND I'LL GO THROUGH THEM BRIEFLY.

THE BOARD ADOPTED A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT THE COUNTY SUBMITTING A SMART SCALE GRANT APPLICATION TO BASICALLY THE STATE ASKING FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A ROAD PROJECT AT COUNTY ROAD OR COUNTY DRIVE, ROUTE 460 AND HINES ROAD AND THERE'S SOME MORE DETAILS ABOUT THAT IN THE PACKET AND IT'S THE PROJECT'S INTENDED TO IMPROVE SAFETY FOR VEHICLES TRAVELING ON ROUTE 460.

THE BOARD ALSO ON JULY 9TH, HELD A PUBLIC HEARING AND POSTPONED A REZONING REQUEST THAT YOU RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ON.

THAT WAS THE CANNON OR ALLEN REZONING.

SO CURRENTLY THAT'S SCHEDULED TO GO BACK TO THE BOARD ON THE AUGUST THE 13TH AND SO THERE'LL BE A PUBLIC HEARING ADVERTISED FOR THAT.

AGAIN. THE BOARD ALSO ON JULY 9TH HELD A DISCUSSION ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN.

TALKING ABOUT WHETHER TO RESTART THAT PROCESS AND HOW MUCH TO INVOLVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

SO THERE WERE SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT AND I THINK THE GIST OF IT IS THAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING RESTARTING THE PROCESS IN THE FULL PROCESS AND FOR THE 2026 FISCAL YEAR AND THERE MAY BE SOME KIND OF PRELIMINARY WORK LESS INVOLVED THAN THE FULL PROCESS IN THE MEET NEXT FISCAL YEAR BEFORE THAT ONE.

THE BOARD ALSO AUTHORIZED THE INITIATION OF A PROFFER AMENDMENT.

THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD COME BACK TO YOU.

THAT'S FOR A PRIVATE PROPERTY.

SO YOU'LL HEAR MORE ABOUT THAT WHEN THE TIME ARRIVES.

THE ALSO APPROVED BY A 3 TO 2 VOTE TO RECONSIDER THE CONDITIONS OF A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST.

[00:30:03]

THEY WERE BASICALLY THINKING ABOUT ONE OF THE CONDITIONS THAT THEY HAD APPROVED IT WITH AND RECONSIDERING THAT CONDITION.

SO. THAT'S WHAT THE BOARD DID IN JULY.

UPCOMING CASES FOR AUGUST.

WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THERE ARE TWO SCHEDULED.

THERE'S A COPY OF THOSE IN YOUR PACKET UNDER TAB SEVEN OR BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF THOSE AND REGARDING UPDATES ON SPECIAL PROJECTS, THE TWO BIGGEST ONES WE'RE WORKING ON, THE ONES TAKING THE MOST OF OUR TIME, ARE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.

WE JUST FINALIZED THE PACKET FOR THE MONDAY WORK SESSION.

SO JUST A COUPLE BUSINESS DAYS FROM NOW, YOU'LL BE BACK HERE AND WE'LL GET YOU THE PACKET.

IT'LL BE AVAILABLE ONLINE TOMORROW, AND THEY'LL BE AVAILABLE.

IF YOU'RE ABLE TO PICK IT UP TOMORROW, IT'LL BE AVAILABLE.

OTHERWISE WE'LL GIVE IT TO YOU ON MONDAY.

BUT IF YOU CAN YOU SHOULD LOOK THROUGH THOSE DOCUMENTS IN ADVANCE.

THERE'S A LOT, THAT WILL BE COVERED ON MONDAY, SO WE'LL SEND YOU A LINK TO ACCESS IT ON THE INTERNET AND AGAIN, THAT'LL BE POSTED ONLINE FOR ANYONE TO GET TO SEE THAT MATERIAL.

ALL RIGHT. THAT'S AND SO WHERE WE'RE AT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PROCESS IS THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS GOING TO REVIEW A DRAFT CHAPTER ONE AS WELL AS A DIAGNOSTIC REPORT ABOUT THE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND YOU'LL ALSO REVIEW A REPORT ON THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT THAT'S HAPPENED SO FAR WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND A DRAFT OF A DEMOGRAPHIC REPORT THAT WILL BE IN THE THAT PLAN DOCUMENT AS WELL.

SO AGAIN, THERE'S LOTS TO LOOK AT.

ENCOURAGE YOU TO READ OVER THAT MATERIAL, THOSE MATERIALS AND BE READY FOR THE PRESENTATION ON MONDAY.

IS THERE ANYBODY THAT CANNOT MAKE IT ON MONDAY? HOW LONG IS IT SUPPOSED TO LAST? AN HOUR AND A HALF, ROUGHLY AND IT STARTS AT WHAT TIME? 5:30. THE CHICKEN'S TOPIC WE GAVE WE IN THE WORK SESSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION ON MONDAY.

WE DISCUSSED STAFF'S RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS FOR THAT, INCLUDING THE PUBLIC INPUT DESIRED THE PUBLIC INPUT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PUBLIC AND THE GENERAL STEPS TO GIVE RECOMMENDATIONS BACK TO THE BOARD.

SO ALL THAT'S INFORMATION IS COVERED IN TAB EIGHT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION PACKET THIS MONTH.

SO IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE WORK SESSION, BUT MOST EVERYTHING REALLY IS IN THAT REPORT THAT'S IN THE PACKET.

SO AT THIS POINT, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR REQUESTS FOR STAFF? HAS BEEN SET FOR THE, PUBLIC COMMENT AT THE FARM BUREAU IS GOING TO.

WE WERE PROPOSING NO OUTSIDE PUBLIC MEETING.

WE'RE PROPOSING THAT IT JUST BE TWO WORK SESSIONS ON NORMAL PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION DATES OR OTHERWISE, AS WE'LL CONFIRM.

BUT BASICALLY TWO LISTENING SESSIONS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO HEAR DIRECTLY FROM THE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SPEAK TO YOU.

SINCE THE BOARD IS LOOKING TO GET THIS THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO MAKE THE RECOMMENDATIONS, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY SPEAK TO YOU AND THAT YOU CAN ALL BE THERE FOR IT. [INAUDIBLE].

CORRECT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'LL JUST CHECK TO SEE IF ANYBODY ELSE HAD ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

OKAY. BEING NONE RECEIVE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT.

SO MOVED. SECOND.

MEETING ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.