[CALL TO ORDER]
[ORDER OF BUSINESS]
[00:01:51]
MOTION TO ADOPT WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES FROM JUNE 20TH, 2023.
NEXT, UNDER TAB THREE, WE HAVE THE ADOPTION OF THE BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE THE 22ND 2023. I NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION. IF THERE ARE NO ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES.
THEY'LL BE ADOPTED AS WRITTEN.
. THANK YOU. NOW WE COME TO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.
[PUBLIC HEARINGS]
MR. GRAVES, ROLL PRESENT.THE FIRST ONE, REZONING RZ-23-02.
ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR ELDER AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THIS IS, AS YOU SEE, OUR 2302 UNDER TAB FOUR IN YOUR PACKET.
WE HAVE A REQUEST BEFORE YOU TO CONDITIONALLY REZONE 14.8 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL RA TO GENERAL BUSINESS B1.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES THIS PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.
IT'S OUTLINED IN RED 14.5 ACRES APPROXIMATELY.
THIS PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ALL CURRENTLY ZONED RA RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
AND THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST, WHICH IS OWNED BY THE COUNTY, IS PLANNED FOR PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC USES.
[00:05:01]
THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW. YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTIES JUST CURRENTLY HAS A LOT OF TREES ON IT.AND YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE MOSTLY ALSO TREES.
THERE IS A PROPERTY TO THE WEST AND THE NORTH WEST THAT ARE MORE THAN TEN ACRES IN SIZE EACH.
THOSE ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES.
BUT ACROSS EACH OF THE ROADS, IT'S BASICALLY VACANT LAND.
THIS IS A VIEW FROM THE INTERSECTION.
YOU CAN SEE THE TREES ON THE PROPERTY.
AND THIS IS. THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
THE APPLICANT'S GOAL IS TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL USES.
AND THOSE COMMERCIAL USES THAT THEY HAVE ENVISIONED INCLUDE MANY STORAGE FACILITY AND OFFICE SPACES.
IN THE SHORT TERM, AN OFFICE AND RETAIL AND POTENTIALLY RESTAURANT USES IN A LONGER TERM.
THEY HAVE PROFFERED RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN BUSINESS LAND USES.
THEY'VE SHOWN A PROPOSED ENTRANCE ON PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE.
PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF COMMENTS.
THE ACREAGE PROPOSED HERE IS APPROXIMATELY 14.8 ACRES.
IT'S DEFINED BY THE CURRENT TAX PARCEL NUMBER AND THAT WAS SUBDIVIDED RELATIVELY RECENT FROM A LARGER PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, WHICH IS OVER 120 ACRES IN SIZE TO THE NORTH OF THIS ONE.
SO THE INITIAL LAND USE, THE MINI STORAGE FACILITY MUST BE PERMITTED BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
AND SO THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A SEPARATE APPROVAL FOR THAT.
AND THAT IS SCHEDULED TO FOLLOW RIGHT AFTER THIS.
IDENTIFIED USES FOR THE PROPERTY INCLUDE OFFICE, WAREHOUSE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT.
THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICANT SPECIFICALLY SAID THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO DO AND WHAT THEY ENVISION.
BUT THEY BASICALLY PROHIBITED CERTAIN LAND USES THAT ARE SPELLED OUT IN THE STAFF REPORT.
AND WE'LL TAKE A BRIEF LOOK AT THOSE LATER ON IN THE PRESENTATION.
THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN PLANS FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USE.
OTHER STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU.
VIRGINIA VDOT AND THEY NOTED THAT IF PROFFERS WERE NOT OFFERED THEN THERE WOULD NEED TO BE A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT DID PROFFER RESTRICTION ON LAND USES AND THAT RESOLVED VDOT COMMENT.
VDOT ALSO NOTED THAT NO TRIP GENERATION OR TURN LANE ANALYSIS WERE SUBMITTED.
HOWEVER, THAT WILL BE RESOLVED DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VDOT HAS SAID THAT THEY DON'T ANTICIPATE FOR MINI STORAGE AND THE OFFICE USES THAT THEY WOULD NEED ANY TURN LANES, BUT THAT WOULD BE CONFIRMED DURING A SITE PLAN REVIEW THAT IS REQUIRED LATER ON.
SO ANY ENTRANCES ON EITHER OF THESE ROADS WOULD HAVE TO MEET VDOT ENTRANCE SPACING REQUIREMENTS.
AND SO THEIR PROPOSED ENTRANCE LOCATION IS MORE THAN 555FT FROM THE INTERSECTION, WHICH SHOULD GIVE ENOUGH ROOM FOR PEOPLE TO SEE THAT INTERSECTION, SEE THAT TURN COMING OFF AS THEY WHILE THERE AFTER THEY LEAVE THE INTERSECTION AND DRIVE NORTH ON PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE.
SO THEY'LL HAVE THOSE WILL BE CONFIRMED DURING THE SITE PLAN PROCESS.
THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NOTED THAT THIS IS IN THE PRINCE GEORGE PLANNING AREA.
WATER, PUBLIC WATER AND WASTEWATER IS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE PROPERTY.
THEY ALSO NOTED THAT THERE'S NOT CURRENTLY CAPACITY IN THE WASTEWATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS, SO THEY NOTED THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO SEEK A WAIVER OF THAT REQUIREMENT FROM THE BOARD IF THAT APPLIES TO THIS.
BUT THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT JUST KIND OF NOTED WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS ARE.
THERE'S JUST TWO PROFFERED CONDITIONS.
THE FIRST ONE IS PROHIBITING CERTAIN LAND USES.
IF IT IS REZONED, YOU CAN SEE VARIOUS LAND USES NOT PERMITTED OR LISTED THERE.
INCLUDING THEATERS AND ASSEMBLY HALLS.
THOSE THAT WOULDN'T BE ALLOWED ON THIS PROPERTY.
[00:10:04]
THEY ALSO PROFFERED IT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO A CONCEPTUAL PLAN.SO. WE LOOKED AT THAT EARLIER.
LET'S GO BACK TO THAT BRIEFLY.
THERE WEREN'T ANY RECEIVED FOR THIS REQUEST.
THERE WERE COMMENTS HEARD DURING THAT PROCESS.
THOSE CONCERNS ARE SUMMARIZED IN THE STAFF REPORT, AND STAFF'S OPINION IS THAT THOSE CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED ARE ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY THE PROFFERS THAT THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED FOR THIS REZONING REQUEST AND ADDRESSED BY REGULATIONS THAT ARE STANDARD AND APPLIED DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW.
SO AGAIN, NO, NEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC ABOUT THIS REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT, TIM STEWART, WHO OWNS IT'S HIS LAND LLC, IS HERE.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR HIM AND I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION ON THESE PROFFERED CONDITIONS.
I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN HERE THAT PREVENTS HIM FROM PUTTING A SERVICE STATION THERE.
IT SAYS SERVICE STATIONS NUMBER 14 IS PROHIBITED.
DO YOU SEE IT? RIGHT. SO A SERVICE STATION IS CONSIDERED A GAS STATION.
THERE WOULD BE A GAS STATION? YEAH, A GAS STATION WOULD FALL UNDER THAT.
SO HE COULD PUT ANYTHING THERE.
OTHER THAN THAT, NOT ON THIS LIST.
BASICALLY, THERE'S A LONGER LIST THAT IS PERMITTED.
AND THIS LIST THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS CUTS OUT THOSE THINGS FROM THAT LIST.
THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST CAN COME TO THE PODIUM.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TURN IT BACK OVER TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
MADAM CHAIR? YES. I MOVE TO FORWARD REQUEST Z-23-02 TO THE BOARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS. AND THE REASON IS IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
OUR NEXT PUBLIC HEARING IS ON SPECIAL EXEMPTION.
THIS IS UNDER YOUR TAB FIVE, AND IT'S THE REQUEST TO PERMIT.
IT'S THE SAME APPLICANT AS THE LAST CASE.
AND THE PURPOSE IS TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A MINI STORAGE FACILITY WITH OUTDOOR BOAT AND RV STORAGE.
THIS PROPERTY, WHICH WE JUST LOOKED AT, IS 14.8 ACRES IN SIZE.
AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
[00:15:03]
HERE'S THE AERIAL SORRY, THE LOCATION MAP AGAIN AND THE ZONING MAP AGAIN.IT'S ALL ZONED RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
BUT YOU'VE JUST RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF ZONING INTO BUSINESS AND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP HERE.
SO THEY'RE WORKING WITH ALL AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, WHICH HAS OTHER FACILITIES IN THE STATE AND IN THE COUNTRY, AND THEY WANT TO DEVELOP A MINI STORAGE FACILITY WITH RV AND BOAT STORAGE TO SERVE RESIDENTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
THEY ESTIMATE THERE WOULD BE 4 TO 5 NEW JOBS, 4 TO 5 NEW JOBS CREATED.
THIS FACILITY WOULD BE OPEN 9 A.M.
TO 5 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY.
IT'S APPROXIMATELY 11.3 ACRES.
AREA OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD INCLUDE ABOUT 96,000FT² OF STORAGE SPACE.
THERE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 20 SPACES FOR RVS OR BOATS STORED OUTSIDE.
THERE'S NOT PLANNED TO BE A RENTAL OFFICE.
THE ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY WOULD BE BY KEYLESS ENTRY.
THERE'LL BE A FRONT GATE LOCKED GATE.
AND THEN THERE IS A PART OF THE PROPERTY THAT'S NOT AFFECTED BY THIS REQUEST WHERE THEY WOULD HAVE OTHER COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED ON THE PROPERTY.
SO THEIR OFFICIAL REQUEST IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW WAREHOUSING WITH INDOOR STORAGE.
AND THERE IS CONCEPTUAL MAP WHICH WE LOOKED AT DURING THE REZONING CASE.
IT SHOWS THE MINI STORAGE FACILITIES OR THE DARKER SHADED BOXES AND THE COMBINED OFFICE WAREHOUSE UNITS ARE THE SMALLER RECTANGLES TOWARD LOCATED TOWARD PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE, WHICH RUNS ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THIS IMAGE.
AND THE PARKING SPACES FOR THAT RVS AND BOATS WOULD BE AROUND THE PERIMETER.
ALL RIGHT. AS A REMINDER, THE DEFINITION OF SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS PROVIDED THERE.
AND REGARDING WAREHOUSING WITH INDOOR STORAGE, THERE'S NO DEFINITION IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
SINCE THIS IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION, YOU CAN ADD CONDITIONS TO IT.
AND SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING A CONDITION THAT WOULD DEFINE THIS AS A BUILDING OR A GROUP OF BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF INDIVIDUAL SELF-CONTAINED UNITS LEASED TO INDIVIDUALS, ORGANIZATIONS OR BUSINESSES FOR SELF-SERVICE STORAGE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY.
WE NOTED THE SURROUNDING LAND USES ARE MOSTLY VACANT.
THERE IS SOME SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AROUND THIS.
THERE'S A TEN ACRE LOT, A 13 ACRE LOT AND A 1 OR 2 ACRE LOT.
THE EXPECTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION WOULD BE SOME AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC NO MORE THAN IS.
YOU KNOW, EXPECTED ON THE PROPERTY.
IF IT'S ZONED COMMERCIAL, A MINI STORAGE FACILITY DOESN'T DRAW A LOT OF TRAFFIC.
PEOPLE COME OCCASIONALLY TO USE THEIR UNIT STORAGE UNITS AND THEN THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE UNITS.
THERE WOULD BE AN AMPLE PARKING PROVIDED FOR THAT.
AND THAT WOULD REALLY DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF BUSINESSES ARE IN THERE.
THERE WOULD BE SOME POSSIBILITY OF SEEING RVS AND BOATS.
HOWEVER, THEY HAVE PROFFERED THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN, WHICH WOULD PUT THOSE IN AN AREA THAT YOU WOULDN'T SEE FROM THE ROAD, AND THEN EVEN THEN FOR THE SURROUNDING HOUSES, THEY WOULD HAVE TO THESE OUTDOOR PARKING AREAS WOULD HAVE TO BE SCREENED BY FENCING AND TREES.
AND SO THEY SHOULDN'T REALLY BE VISIBLE FOR SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS BASED ON THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS OF THE REZONING AND THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR THIS REQUEST ABOUT THE MINI STORAGE FACILITY AND OTHER BUFFERING, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ARE STANDARD ADDRESSED DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW.
VDOT THESE ARE THE SIMILAR COMMENTS THAT WERE PROVIDED DURING THE REZONING.
[00:20:11]
SO VITA HAD NO OBJECTION.AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS IN THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
AGAIN, NOTING THAT THIS IS THE CODE REQUIREMENT IS THAT IT REQUIRES PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER.
THERE IS SOME FLEXIBILITY BASED ON THE LACK OF CAPACITY HERE OF HOW THEY PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE TO THEIR PROPERTY, RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.
THERE'S SOME OF THE CONDITIONS ARE HIGHLIGHTED HERE.
AND THERE'S A COMPLETE LIST OF STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IN THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
NUMBER ONE, THIS EXPLAINS WHAT THE PERMITTED USE OF THE PROPERTY IS A SELF STORAGE FACILITY AND ALSO OUTDOOR STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND BOATS AND OFFICE WAREHOUSE UNITS OF A SIZE AND SCOPE CONSISTENT WITH THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND SELF STORAGE FACILITY WOULD MEAN A BUILDING.
THIS JUST EXPLAINS WHAT THAT MEANS.
DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORM TO THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN.
THE NEXT CONDITION IS ABOUT THE OUTDOOR PARKING OF BOATS AND VEHICLES WOULD NEED TO BE ADEQUATELY SCREENED FROM VIEW, FROM PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY AND ANY OCCUPIED DWELLING AND NO STORED IN ANY OF THE STORED ITEMS WOULD HAVE TO BE NOT VISIBLE BEHIND A FENCE BASICALLY.
IF THEY DO HAVE A SIGN ADVERTISING LOCATION, THEN IT WILL NEED TO BE A MONUMENT STYLE.
PORTABLE SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY AND FLASHING ARROWS WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED.
THE FACILITY WILL NEED TO BE SECURED BY AND GATED WITH A KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM AND THERE WOULD NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FOOT BUFFER YARD OF TREES AND SHRUBS IN BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL USE OF THE PROPERTY AND ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTIES.
AND THERE WOULD BE POTENTIAL UP TO 25 ADDITIONAL FEET IF NEEDED AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN REVIEW.
AND AGAIN, THE WHOLE ALL OF THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS ARE IN THE STAFF REPORT.
THERE WERE COMMENTS THAT WERE HEARD ABOUT THE THE APPLICANT'S ORIGINAL REQUEST TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND STAFF BELIEVES THOSE ARE THOSE CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED ARE ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY EXISTING STANDARDS IN THE ORDINANCE AND BY THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE RECOMMENDED.
SO THE APPLICANT, TIM STEWART, IS HERE.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR HIM, I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.
YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THERE WILL BE A BUFFER BETWEEN 156 AND THE STORAGE AREA.
THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING AROUND PARKING AREAS AS THEIR CONCEPTUAL PLAN SHOWS THAT THEY PLAN TO HAVE THAT THERE IS NO CONDITION REQUIRING A BUFFER FROM PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE.
BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE LAYOUT, THE ONLY WAY TO SEE THIS STORAGE UNITS WOULD BE TO LOOK UP THE ENTRANCE ROAD AS YOU'RE PASSING BY AND THEN THE TREES WILL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THEY DEVELOP THAT CORNER PART OF THE PROPERTY, IN WHICH CASE THERE WOULD BE, IN THEORY, BUILDINGS THERE.
AND ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, WE'LL LOOK AT THAT AT SITE PLAN REVIEW.
25 FOOT BUFFER YARD IN BETWEEN COMMERCIAL USES AND ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES.
SO THAT INCLUDES THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET.
SO THERE'S ROOM FOR FLEXIBILITY ON THAT.
AND THE ENTRANCE IS GOING TO BE FROM PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE.
I DON'T THINK IT'S POSSIBLE TO HAVE AN ENTRANCE ON QUAKER.
YEP. SINCE THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST COME TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
[00:25:14]
SEEING NO ONE WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS? FIRST OF ALL, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU ALL FOR HEARING ME TODAY AND THANK YOU ALL FOR CONSIDERING THIS.THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS YOU WANT TO ASK, PLEASE FEEL FREE.
I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY KNOWS ME.
MY NAME IS TIM STEWART. MY FAMILY RUNS NANNY'S RESTAURANT.
I'VE LIVED HERE MY WHOLE LIFE.
MY FAMILY'S LIVED HERE THEIR WHOLE LIFE.
MY CHILDREN WENT TO SCHOOL HERE.
I'VE LIVED HERE. MY GRANDSON IS NOW SEVEN MONTHS OLD.
AND HOPEFULLY HE'LL LIVE HERE.
THIS IS WHERE WE'D LIKE TO SPEND OUR MONEY.
THIS IS WHERE WE'D LIKE TO PUT OUR TAX MONEY TO SUPPORT MY FAMILY.
YOUR QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER TREES WILL BE IN FRONT OF IT ON 156? IT WILL BE TO A CERTAIN POINT, BUT I HAVE TO HAVE A SIGNAGE OF SOMETHING SO SOMEBODY CAN SEE TO GO DOWN THE ROAD.
BUT YES, SIR, IF YOU LOOK ON THE MAP, IT'S PRETTY MUCH WRAPPED IN TREES.
WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP IT AS HIDDEN AS POSSIBLE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS Y'ALL MIGHT HAVE OR ANYTHING? CONCERNS. AND.
ALL RIGHTY. THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM.
OKAY, I'LL TURN THIS BACK OVER TO THE COMMISSIONERS AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AFTER CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, TURN IT BACK OVER TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
. OKAY. OUR NEXT PUBLIC HEARING AS OUR REZONING RZ-23-05.
MY NAME AND MADAM VICE CHAIR AND THE MEMBERS OF THE PC.
PRESENTING REZONING CASE Z 2305.
REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 2.5 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL TO AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO GENERAL BUSINESS B1 ZONING DISTRICT.
THE PURPOSE OF THE REZONING IS TO ALLOW THE.
DISPLAY AND SALE OF SHEDS, STORAGE BUILDINGS.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8801 COUNTY DRIVE AND IT IS A PORTION OF TAX MAP 4600800013-B.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES THAT THE PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR FUTURE AGRICULTURAL USES.
THE SLIDE THAT YOU SEEING, THAT'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
THE NEXT SLIDE IS THE ZONING MAP, WHICH SHOWS THAT A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS ZONED B1 IN THE OTHER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE REZONING IS ZONED.
RR. THE NEXT VISUAL IS THE FUTURE COMP PLAN MAP, WHICH SHOWS THE AREA PLANNED FOR FUTURE AGRICULTURAL USE. THE NEXT VISUAL IS PICTURES OF THE SITE.
IN THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE AREA FOR THE PLACEMENT OF THE SHEDS.
THE NEXT VISUAL IS A PICTURES OF THE SHEDS THAT WILL BE.
THOSE ARE SOME OF THE TYPES AND STYLES OF THE SHEDS THAT WILL BE SOLD THERE.
[00:30:03]
BACKGROUND. THE PROPERTY CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES AND IS LOCATED AT 8801 COUNTY DRIVE.IN 1987, APPROXIMATELY 1.4 ACRES OF THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED TO BE ONE AND THERE HAS BEEN SUBSEQUENT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR A WOODWORKING SHOP AND A AUTO REPAIR SHOP, WHICH WAS GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN THE YEAR 1995 AND IN THE YEAR 2000.
IN 2005, 2.6 EXTRA ACRES WERE ADDED TO THE 1.4 ACRES. THE 2.6 ACRES ARE ZONED R.
A. MEANWHILE, THE OTHER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IS ALREADY ZONED BUSINESS.
THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY THREE.
QUONSET HUTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY THAT ARE BEING USED FOR VARIOUS BUSINESS USES.
MARTHA JOHNSON, WHO IS THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF.
PEARLE VISION NEW STRUCTURES LLC WISHES TO LOCATE AN OFFICE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO SELL GRACELAND SHEDS STORAGE BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY.
THE APPLICANT HAS A LOT THAT'S LOCATED IN THE CITY OF PETERSBURG, WHICH SHE WOULD LIKE TO LOCATE HERE IN PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY AT THE SITE.
THE NEXT PHASE U IS A CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT SHOWING THE PLACEMENT OF THE STORAGE SHEDS.
PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF COMMENTS.
THE DESIRED LAND USE APPEARS TO BE SIMILAR TO OR THE USE IS NO MORE INTENSIVE THAN OTHER LAND USES THAT ARE ALLOWED BY.
RIGHT. IN THE B1 ZONING DISTRICT.
THEREFORE, THE DESIGNS ON SALE OF THE SHEDS WOULD BE A USE THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED BY RIGHT.
OTHER ZONING APPROVALS WOULD BE.
THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET A BUILDING IN THE ZONING.
THEY HAD TO GET A BUSINESS LICENSE AND BASED ON THE IMPACT OF THE SITE, IT WOULD PROBABLY NOT HAVE TO HAVE A SITE PLAN DONE.
COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING LAND USES.
AND EVEN THOUGH THE PROPOSED REZONING IS NOT. CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STAFF STEALS FIELD.
THE THAT THE REZONING IS STILL.
COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING LAND USES THAT'S ON THE PROPERTY NOW.
WOULD BE MINOR AND THEY WILL PROBABLY BE MINIMUM TRAFFIC IN NOISE.
OF THE MAJOR STAFF COMMENTS CAME FROM VDOT AND VDOT STATED THAT ONLY ONE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE WOULD BE ALLOWED.
AND THAT THE EXISTING INSURANCE DOES.
[00:35:02]
REQUIRE MAINTENANCE AS THERE ARE SOME POTHOLES.VDOT. VIRAT HAS STATED THAT THE SITE IS CURRENTLY SERVED BY A COMMERCIAL INTEREST.
VIRAT ALSO HAS STATED THAT MODIFICATIONS MAY BE NEEDED TO THE EXISTING FENCE, LINE AND GATE TO ENSURE THAT VEHICLES ACCESSING THE SITE.
HAVE SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BETWEEN THE GATE AND IN THE ROAD, AND VDOT HAS NO.
PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS WERE MAILED TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS.
STAFF RAN THE LEGAL ADS IN THE LOCAL PAPER, AND STAFF POSTED A SIGN ON THE PROPERTY ON THE 14TH.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ZONING.
AND THE RECOMMENDATION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING.
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST APPEARS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH CURRENT AND FUTURE SURROUNDING LAND USES, AND THERE HAS BEEN NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK FROM ANY NEIGHBORS OR FROM THE PUBLIC.
AND THAT'S THE END OF MY PRESENTATION.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME.
AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU. ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? MR. GREEN? NO, THANK YOU.
WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SAY ANYTHING? THANK YOU. I'M GOOD.
THANK YOU. TURN IT BACK TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. ALL RIGHT.
MADAM CHAIRMAN, I MOVE TO FORWARD REQUEST 23-05 TO THE BOARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL AS IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CURRENT SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING DISTRICTS.
. OUR NEXT PUBLIC HEARING IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN.
THIS IS A REQUEST OF ARROWWOOD ADDICTION TREATMENT CENTER LLC, AND THE PROPERTY OWNER IS HOSPITALITY SEVEN INC, AND THE REQUEST IS TO PERMIT A SPECIAL CARE HOSPITAL WITHIN A GENERAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ABOUT 21 ACRES IN SIZE AND IT'S LOCATED AT 5305 PLAZA DRIVE TAX MAP 120 A1A AND THE COMP PLAN INDICATES THIS PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR PUBLIC SEMIPUBLIC USES.
YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED.
IT'S LOCATED ON THE EDGE OF FORT GREG ADAMS, WHICH SURROUNDS IT ON THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST.
[00:40:04]
ALONG WITH TEMPLE AVENUE AND OAKLAND BOULEVARD, IT'S NEXT TO THE CITY OF HOPEWELL AND WE'LL SEE AN AERIAL VIEW IN A SECOND. SO THE CLOSEST PROPERTIES IN PRINCE GEORGE ARE LOCATED ACROSS OAKLAND BOULEVARD AT THE CROSSINGS SHOPPING CENTER.IT'S ZONED FOR BUSINESS AND FOR GREG ADAMS AROUND IT, YOU CAN SEE IT THE SHADED.
AND THEN ACROSS THE STREET IN THE CROSSINGS, YOU HAVE MOSTLY BUSINESS ZONING AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE PROPERTY ONLY HAS WHAT LOOKS LIKE THREE BUILDINGS.
IT'S REALLY ONE BUILDING, THREE PARTS AT THE TOP CORNER OF THAT SHAPE OF THE PARCEL.
AND YOU CAN SEE THE REST OF THE PROPERTY IS TREES.
AND THEN YOU CAN SEE FORT GREG ADAMS TO THE WEST.
THAT PROPERTY WAS REZONED TO BUSINESS IN 1988.
THERE WERE NO PROFFERED CONDITIONS.
A PRIOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION WAS OBTAINED FOR THIS BUILDING ON THIS PROPERTY IN 2012 FOR A SPECIAL CARE HOSPITAL, AND THAT ONE WAS FOR A DEMENTIA TREATMENT FACILITY CALLED SUNFLOWER GARDENS.
AND SO THIS APPLICANT'S GOALS ARE TO USE THE EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING ON THE 21 ACRE PARCEL TO TREAT PATIENTS WHO CHOOSE TO BE THERE FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND OTHER MENTAL HEALTH ILLNESSES.
AND SO THIS THE USE THAT THEY HAVE IN MIND IS CALLED A SPECIAL CARE HOSPITAL.
AND PERMITTED BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
THIS IS A PICTURE OF THE FRONT ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING.
IT'S AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY.
AND THEN BEYOND THAT, YOU HAVE OAKLAND PLAZA AND CITY OF HOPEWELL.
THERE'S EXISTING SIMILAR TYPE OF USE OR RECENTLY THERE WAS A SIMILAR TYPE OF USE IN THERE.
AND SO THERE'S NOT EXPECTED TO BE ANY NEW IMPACTS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN THERE.
AND AGAIN, THERE'S NOT LIKE BASED ON WHAT THEY DO, PEOPLE COME TO THE FACILITY AND STAY THERE.
SO THERE'S JUST VERY LITTLE YOU WOULDN'T EVEN NOTICE UNLESS YOU GO INTO IT.
SO THE COMPATIBILITY COMPATIBILITY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS YES, OVERALL, THE PLAN DOES CALL THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CALLS FOR PUBLIC OR SEMIPUBLIC USES ON THIS PROPERTY. I THINK THAT'S MORE BECAUSE IT'S NEXT TO FORT LEE THAN FORT GREG ADAMS THAN ANY OTHER REASON.
BUT ALSO THIS IS SIMILAR TO PUBLIC USES.
IT'S AN INSTITUTIONAL TYPE ACTIVITY.
THERE WERE REALLY NONE FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS.
THEY JUST PROVIDED INFORMATION.
ABOUT THE. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE REALLY JUST INFORMATION TO THE APPLICANT.
SO RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FROM STAFF ARE VERY LIMITED.
THEY'RE ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE.
SO JUST SPECIFICALLY WHAT THEY ASK FOR, THIS IS LIMITED TO THE EXISTING BUILDING.
THEY DON'T THEY HAVEN'T THEY DON'T HAVE PLANS TO EXPAND IT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
[00:45:02]
SO THAT'S THEIR PLAN.ALL REQUIRED FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LICENSES PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED.
BUT WE LIKE TO PUT THAT IN THERE JUST TO PUT THAT OUT THERE THAT.
ALL RIGHT. AND THEN THE THE FULL LIST OF CONDITIONS IS IN THE DRAFT ORDINANCE AND THE STAFF REPORT.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.
AND THE REASONING IS THAT IT APPEARS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED WAS RECEIVED AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS ARE PROVIDED AND THEY ARE SUPPORTED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE APPLICANT IS BASED IN KENTUCKY SO THEY COULDN'T MAKE IT TO THIS MEETING.
THE COMMERCIAL BROKER IS HERE.
IF YOU IN CASE YOU HAVE QUESTIONS THAT HE MIGHT BE ABLE TO ANSWER.
DOES ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. OKAY.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK WITH THE BROKER? NO ONE.
OKAY. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.
SO ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TURN IT BACK TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
GREEN WILL PRESENT REZONING RZ 23-08.
IN THE TIME SINCE THE PC WORK SESSION HELD ON MONDAY, THE APPLICANT HAS UPDATED THEIR PROPHETS.
ARTICLE SEVEN, SECTION TWO OF THE PC BYLAWS INCLUDES A TIME LIMIT THAT PROPHETS MUST BE RECEIVED AT LEAST TEN DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE.
THE SAME SECTION OF THE BYLAWS ALSO.
ALLOWS FOR A TIME LIMIT TO BE WAIVED FOR A CASE BY A U.
BY A UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THE PLANNING MEMBERS PRESENT.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROFIT CONDITIONS AND STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF A WAIVER OF THE TIME LIMIT FOR FULL FOR THIS CASE.
BEFORE A MOTION IS MADE, THE CASE NUMBER SHOULD BE RZ-23-08, NOT ZERO FOUR.
MADAM CHAIR, I MOVE TO SUSPEND THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE SEVEN, SECTION TWO OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS FOR CASE RZ- 23-08 TO WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING PROFFERS SO THAT THE COMMISSION MAY CONSIDER THE PROFFER SUBMITTED FOR THIS CASE.
THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 74.15 ACRES FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL M2.
ZONING DISTRICT TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL M3 ZONING DISTRICT.
THE PURPOSE OF THE REZONING IS TO ALLOW BATTERY MANUFACTURING, BATTERY PARTS, MANUFACTURING AND R&D.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT.
[00:50:02]
8800 WELLS STATION ROAD AND IS TAX MAP NUMBER 3400800134-B. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES THAT THE PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR FUTURE INDUSTRIAL LAND USES.THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS A AERIAL VIEW OF THE.
THE NEXT ISSUE IS THE ZONING MAP.
THE GRAY AREA SHOWS THE SITE AS IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED.
M2. THE ADJOINING PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED RA RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE LAND USE MAP SHOWS THAT THE PROPERTY IS PLANNED FOR FUTURE INDUSTRIAL.
THE NEXT VISUAL IS THE SITE OF THE CAMPUS.
BACKGROUND. THE SITE HAS BEEN GENERALLY USED IN THE PAST AS A FORMER ROLLS-ROYCE COMPLEX.
THE SITE CONTAINS APPROXIMATELY 291,689FT² OF BUILDING SPACE, AND THE CAMPUS IS NOW VACANT.
ESSER WELL, STATION ROAD, LLC PURCHASED 880.4 ACRES FROM ROLLS-ROYCE, AND THEY CONDITIONALLY REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM R2 TO M-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL IN THE YEAR OF 2022 TO MARKET THE SITE FOR INDUSTRIAL USE.
74.15 ACRES WAS DIVIDED FROM THE 880 ACRES.
AND IS THE SUBJECT OF THE FILM AND AND IS THE SUBJECT OF THE REZONING.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT 74.15 ACRES BE CONDITIONALLY REZONED FROM M TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO M3 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO ALLOW FOR BATTERY MANUFACTURING, BATTERY PARTS, MANUFACTURING AND AN R&D ASSOCIATED WITH BATTERIES.
THE POTENTIAL TENANT INTENDS TO SET UP VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF BATTERY MANUFACTURING, INCLUDING AN ADVANCED AND THIS IS A TONGUE TWISTER, A PRE LITHIATION AND LITHIUM ANODE MANUFACTURING PLANT TO ACCELERATE THE TRANSITION TO NEXT GENERATION LITHIUM ION BATTERIES.
THE APPLICANT HAS VOLUNTARILY PROFFERED SEVERAL CONDITIONS TO THE REZONING.
THE PROPER CONDITIONS AS RECEIVED THIS MORNING.
THE ONLY CHANGE THAT WAS MADE, REALLY TO THE PROFITS WAS THAT THE APPLICANT.
TIED THE PROFITS TO THE 74.15 ACRES OF PROPERTY.
THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE REZONING.
INSTEAD OF TYING THE PROFITS TO THE 880 ACRES ON TRACK.
THE PROFITS MADE ALSO RESTRICTS THAT THE ONLY USES OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE THREE DISTRICTS WILL BE BATTERY AND BATTERY PARKS.
MANUFACTURING AND THE R&D OF BATTERIES AND BATTERY PARTS.
ALL M3 USES EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING USES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.
ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THIS EVENING.
I WOULD NOT READ EVERY USE THAT THEY EXCLUDED, BUT.
THESE ARE THE ONE IN THE FOLLOWING PROPER.
WAS THAT A VEGETATIVE BUFFER OF NOT LESS THAN 75FT SHALL BE INSTALLED AND THAT BUFFER IS ON EXISTING. SO REALLY THAT'S JUST STATING THAT THAT BUFFER WILL ALWAYS HAVE TO BE THERE.
[00:55:08]
PLANNING AND STAFF COMMENTS.THE PROPOSED REZONING AFFECTS LAND AND STRUCTURES UTILIZED IN THE PAST FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES.
THE REMAINING LAND OWNED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER.
WHICH IS NOT AFFECTED BY THE REZONING.
THE PROPOSED USE BATTERY MANUFACTURER WILL BE CONTAINED IN EXISTING BUILDINGS.
THE PROPOSED USE SHOULD NOT PRODUCE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS SUCH AS FOUL ODOR.
OR NOISE NOTABLE STAFF COMMENTS CAME FROM VDOT.
VDOT CONCURS THAT THE PROPOSED REZONING CASE DOES NOT REQUIRE THE SUBMITTAL OF A CHAPTER 527 TIA AND ALSO NOTABLE NOTE CAME FROM THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT'S JUST STATING FOR THE RECORD.
A AND FOR THE APPLICANT THAT THERE IS ONLY 48,508 GALLONS PER DAY FOR THE BUILDING.
A AND STATING THAT THERE ARE PLANS.
IN PLACE TO UPGRADE THE WATER AT THE SITE.
UM. STAFF PUBLIC NOTICE AND FEEDBACK STAFF NOTIFIED THE ADJACENT.
PROPERTY OWNERS BY MAIL AND STAFF.
STAFF RAN THE LEGAL ADS IN THE LOCAL PAPER, AND STAFF POSTED A SIGN ON THE PROPERTY ON THE 14TH.
STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT'S PROFIT.
THE RECOMMENDATION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING.
COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES A REZONING FROM M2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO M3.
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY'S ADOPTED COMP PLAN.
THERE ARE NO MAJOR CONCERNS FROM FROM OTHER AGENCIES.
THERE HAS BEEN NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK FROM ANY ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OR FROM THE PUBLIC, BUT SEVERAL CONDITIONS WHICH STAFF FINDS TO BE.
ACCEPTABLE. THAT'S THE END OF MY STAFF REPORT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME.
I WILL ENTERTAIN THEM IN THE END.
AND THERE IS LEGAL REPRESENTATION HERE, TOO, TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.
YOU WON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. GREEN. THANK YOU.
SO ANYONE WITH COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST.
IF YOU WILL PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.
STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TURN IT BACK OVER TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
WHAT IS YOUR DESIRE? MADAM CHAIRMAN, I MOVE TO FORWARD REQUEST RZ-23-08 TO THE BOARD WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BECAUSE IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CURRENT SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING DISTRICTS.
[01:00:15]
. THANK YOU. NOW, MR. GRAVES, WOULD YOU GIVE US THE COMMUNICATION?[COMMUNICATIONS]
ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE FIRST ITEM OF COMMUNICATIONS IS THE ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FOR JULY.ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
YOU HAVE THE RECAP IN YOUR PACKET.
AND ON JULY 11TH, THE BOARD APPROVED THE REZONING AND THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST FOR THE MEAD PRODUCTION FACILITY WITH THE TASTING ROOM, HALEY'S HONEY MEADERY AND UP FOR AUGUST NEXT MONTH'S PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
WE CURRENTLY ONLY HAVE ONE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED AND THEN FINALLY, THE LAST ANNOUNCEMENT.
HE HAS ANNOUNCED HIS RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 31ST.
DID YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR REQUESTS OF STAFF? ANYONE DO.
I HAD ONE QUESTION JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY.
SO IN MY SHORT TIME OF BEING ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THIS IS LIKE THE FIFTH CASE WHERE BETWEEN 156 AND DISPUTANTA WE'VE HAD TO APPROVE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOR COMMERCIAL REASONS.
IS THERE ANY WAY THAT ANY TYPE OF MOTION OR CHANGE COULD BE BROUGHT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO UPDATE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE ENTIRE SECTION? MY MAIN CONCERN IS WE'VE GOT ALL OF THESE CITIZENS THAT THEIR APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED $750,100 TO GET AN EXEMPTION APPROVED BECAUSE BASICALLY IT'S BECAUSE OF, YOU KNOW, THE CURRENT PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE NEEDS OF THE COUNTY.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S POSSIBLE OR IF DO WE HAVE TO DO THESE INDIVIDUAL EXCEPTIONS FOR EACH REQUEST.
OKAY. SO SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE COMP PLAN.
SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS JUST THERE'S A LIST OF USES IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT.
THEY'RE SPECIFICALLY HAVE TO GO TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
UM, SO I MEAN, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT TWO THINGS.
ONE IS ONE, BEING HAVING THE COMP PLAN UPDATED FOR A WHOLE QUARTER.
IS THAT STILL WHAT YOU'RE GETTING AT? OKAY. BECAUSE THAT WON'T AFFECT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS.
BUT THAT MAYBE IS A THAT'S DEFINITELY ON THE LIST OF THINGS THAT WE WILL LOOK AT.
THERE'S WE'RE WORKING ON SCOPING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
YOU'LL HEAR MORE ABOUT THAT SOON.
UM, BUT THAT WOULD BE AN AREA THAT WE WOULD LOOK AT.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO MAKE A MOTION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT THAT WILL BE ON THE LIST.
ONE 156 DOES HAVE A LOT OF REQUESTS.
YEAH, BUT 2156 WOULD JUST BE DOWN.
THE ONLY NO AGRICULTURAL LAND USE THROUGH THAT PART OF THE CORRIDOR.
SO IT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE SENSE THAT THE PLAN B FOR AGRICULTURAL USE.
RIGHT. THAT WAS A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO LOOK AT THAT CORRIDOR WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THE COMP PLAN REQUEST FOR THIS ONE PROPERTY THAT YOU RECOMMENDED SOME OTHER THINGS ON TONIGHT. WE TALKED ABOUT HOW GENERALLY THE CORRIDORS SUCH AS 156 IN PARTICULAR SHOULD BE LOOKED AT FOR MAYBE WHEN I WAS ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT LIKE 460.
OKAY. BETWEEN THAT 1 TO 6 AND [INAUDIBLE] THAT ONE.
YEP. GENERALLY THE CORRIDORS NEED A GOOD LOOK.
I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD HELP ELIMINATE SOME OF THE.
OKAY. AND THEN ABOUT ITS OWN EXCEPTION BECAUSE IT DOESN'T ALIGN WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE SO THEN SPECIAL EXCEPTION HAVING A LOT OF SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS IS A SEPARATE THING AND THAT'S WE'LL LOOK AT THAT WHEN WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ORDINANCE UPDATES.
YOU CAN HAVE FEWER THINGS REQUIRE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS.
MAYBE IF THEY'RE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED BY.
RIGHT. WITH UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.
YEAH. OH, I HAVE HAD PEOPLE ASK ME WHAT IS GOING ON AT THE CORNER OF SANDY RIDGE AND RUFFIN ROAD. YEAH.
WHAT ARE THEY BUILDING THERE? SANDY RIDGE AND RUFFIN ROAD.
[01:05:02]
NO. UM, IT'S DOWN FURTHER TEN.YEAH. THEY'RE JUST TIMBERING THE PROPERTY.
YEAH. THERE'S TIMBERING. THE ONE, THOUGH THAT IS AT THE CORNER OF TEN AND WHERE YOU TURN ON.
YEAH. THAT'S AN UNPERMITTED ACTIVITY AND WE'RE LOOKING INTO THAT.
THAT'S AN UNPERMITTED ACTIVITY.
OH, OKAY. BUT YOU GO DOWN FURTHER AND YOU MAKE A LEFT AND THAT'S ON SANDY RIDGE, RIGHT? THAT'S JUST TIMBER CUTTING.
I'LL THROW OUT TEN ISSUE WAS THE THE WORDS WHERE THEY WERE PUTTING NEW WATER LINES IN.
THAT IS ALSO HAPPENING ON ROUTE.
YEAH. ON I THINK RUFFIN ROAD THERE'S A NEW WATER LINE BEING PUT IN.
YEAH. BUT THEY HAVE CLEARED OFF A HUGE PIECE OF PROPERTY THERE.
OKAY. YOU GO TO TURN ONTO, I DON'T KNOW THE NAME OF RUFFIN RUFFIN ROAD AND ROAD.
AND THEN AS SOON AS YOU GET THERE A LITTLE WAYS DOWN THE ROAD, YOU CAN SEE AN OPENING BACK IN THERE.
RIGHT. I THOUGHT THAT WAS WHERE THEY WERE COORDINATING THE PIPE STUFF.
BUT IT'S NOT THE PIPE STUFF IS ALONG THE ROAD.
AND SO BACK IN THERE IS SOMETHING ELSE, BUT NOTHING'S PERMITTED THERE.
NOTHING'S BEEN SUBMITTED FOR FOR THAT PROPERTY.
ANYONE ELSE? DO I HEAR A MOTION TO ADJOURN? MOTION TO ADJOURN.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.