[00:00:02]
CALL TO ORDER OF THE PRINCE GEORGE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 24TH, 2022 MEETING.WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? MR. SIMMONS.
HERE. MR. BROWN, MR. BROCKWELL. HERE.
THANK YOU. THIS TIME, IF EVERYONE WOULD STAND MS. ELDER TO GIVE THE INVOCATION AND MR. JOYNER LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
LET'S PRAY. DEAR LORD, AS WE COME TONIGHT TO DO BUSINESS OF THE COUNTY, LET US REMEMBER THOSE THAT ARE SICK.
AND LET. OH, DEAR LORD, BLESS MRS. BROWN WITH GOOD HEALTH.
ALSO, LET US REMEMBER THE TURMOIL.
AND LET US ONCE MORE REMEMBER THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT ARE IN SUCH NEED OF YOU.
NOW, LET US GO HOME SAFELY TO OUR FAMILIES IN JESUS NAME.
AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE REPUBLIC, WHICH IS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
COMMISSIONER, YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU THE AGENDA FOR THE NIGHT AND IF IT'S ACCEPTABLE TO
[ADOPTION OF AGENDA]
YOU, I NEED A MOTION TO ADOPT THE AGENDA.MAKES THAT MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN. SECOND.
MOTION AND SECOND, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
YES. AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.
THIS IS FOR ANYONE, IT'S OPEN FOR ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSIONERS ON ANY TOPIC THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
THERE'S NO ONE HERE, IS THERE ANYONE ON ZOOM? NO, SIR, THERE'S NO ONE ON ZOOM.
I HEREBY CLOSED THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.
NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THE ADOPTION OF THE WORK SESSION MINUTES FROM JANUARY 24TH,
[ORDER OF BUSINESS]
2022. GIVE THOSE MINUTES IN FRONT OF YOU IF THERE'S NO ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS I'LL ASK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE.MOTION AND SECOND, CALL ROLL, PLEASE.
ALSO IN FRONT OF YOU NOW, YOU HAVE THE MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 27, 2022 MEETING, IF THERE ARE NO ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THEM. MAKE A MOTION WE ACCEPT THEM.
IS THERE A SECOND? A MOTION CALL THE ROLL PLEASE.
[00:05:01]
JOYNER. YES. MRS. ELDER.NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS A RESOLUTION TO COMMEND MR. EASTER FOR HIS SERVICE.
ARE YOU GOING TO DO? GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THIS EVENING, WE WOULD LIKE FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW A RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION TO MR. JAMES EASTER, WHO HAS SERVED ON THIS COMMISSION FAITHFULLY FOR MANY YEARS.
HE RECENTLY RESIGNED, AS YOU'RE AWARE, AND WE HAVE PUT TOGETHER THIS RESOLUTION AND I REQUESTED FROM CHAIRMAN BRESKO IF WE COULD BRING IT FORWARD THIS EVENING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MATTER OR ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION YOU MAY NEED.
ANY QUESTIONS? MR. CHAIRMAN. YES.
TO ORDER I WOULD MOVE THE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS RESOLUTION.
[INAUDIBLE] TO MR. EASTER AN APPROPRIATE WAY.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. SIMMONS, SECOND BY MR. BROCKWELL TO FORWARD THIS RESOLUTION CALL THE ROLL PLEASE.
THANK YOU. AND IF I MAY, MR. CHAIRMAN ON THE ITEM A4, I'D LIKE TO SPEAK A MINUTE ON THE PROPOSED TRAINING . AT YOUR DESK THIS EVENING, I LEFT THE HANDOUT WITH SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON DR.
CHANDLER. THIS INDIVIDUAL IS THE ONE WHO HAS PROVIDED TRAINING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS IN THE PAST.
HE ALSO HAS PROVIDED TRAINING THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF VIRGINIA AND ACTUALLY HAS PROVIDED A CERTIFIED PLANNING COMMISSIONER SCHOOL AS WELL.
WE HAVE REQUESTED AND GOT APPROVED TO OFFER OUR COMMISSIONERS A HALF DAY REFRESHER COURSE OUR IN CASE OF NEW MEMBERS WHO HAVEN'T BEEN HERE SINCE MR. CHANDLER'S BEEN HERE LAST.
REFRESHER OR NEW TRAINING ORIENTATION.
HE'S AGREED TO COME DOWN FOR HALF A DAY.
I BELIEVE MR. GRAVES SPOKE WITH YOU AT THE LAST MEETING ABOUT WHETHER AFTERNOONS OR MORNINGS OR EVENINGS WOULD BE BEST, AND THE FEEDBACK I GOT WAS AFTERNOON.
SO I HAVE THREE AFTERNOONS DATES THAT I'D LIKE YOU TO TAKE NOTE OF, AND WE WILL FOLLOW UP WITH AN EMAIL AND SEE WHICH DATE WORKS BEST.
IF MONDAY, MARCH 14TH IN THE AFTERNOON, IT WOULD TYPICALLY BE ONE TO FIVE AND WE CAN ADJUST THAT IF WE NEED TO.
THURSDAY, MARCH 17TH IN THE AFTERNOON OR MONDAY, APRIL, THE 11TH IN THE AFTERNOON. SO IF YOU WOULD PLEASE CHECK YOUR SCHEDULES AND MISSY AND I OR I WILL SEND OUT AN EMAIL THE NEXT DAY OR TWO TO SEE IF WE CAN COME UP WITH A DATE THAT SUITS EVERYONE THE BEST. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THAT'S ALL I HAD. IF ANYBODY HAD ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRAINING OR MR. CHANDLER, I'D BE HAPPY TO ASSIST.
QUESTIONS ON TRAINING? NO ONE, THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, SIR. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA, OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS
[PUBLIC HEARINGS]
OF REZONING AMENDMENT RZ-21-06 REQUEST OF [INAUDIBLE] VIRGINIA TO LLC TO AMEND AND REPLACE THE CONDITIONS OF REZONING RZ-20-04 AND ZONING CASE AMENDMENT RZ-2005 TO CONSOLIDATE ZONING CONDITIONS UNDER ONE ZONING CASE AND ELIMINATE LAND USE RESTRICTION ON HIGH CUBE WAREHOUSES.[INAUDIBLE]. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, AND GOOD EVENING AND GOOD EVENING.
MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, [INAUDIBLE].
ALL RIGHT. FIRST SLIDE, YOU CAN SEE THE AREA MAP WHERE THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED.
IT'S AT THE END OF HARD, AT THE END OF QUALITY WAY IN THE SOUTH POINT INDUSTRIAL PARK.
[00:10:01]
AND YOU CAN SEE IT OUTLINED IN RED THERE.THIS IS THE ZONING MAP THE GRAY COLOR IS FOR N1 INDUSTRIAL.
PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED N1 INDUSTRIAL AND THERE IS AN AERIAL VIEW.
THE PROPERTY IS STILL OUTLINED IN RED AND AT THE TIME THAT THIS AERIAL VIEW WAS TAKEN, IT WAS VACANT.
AND AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME, TODAY IT'S THERE'S A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND SQUARE FEET, APPROXIMATELY.
THE BACKGROUND ON THIS CASE IS THAT ON THIS PROPERTY, THERE WERE TWO ZONING CASES APPROVED IN 2020.
AND THE REASON THAT THERE WERE TWO ZONING CASES FOR ONE PROPERTY IS BECAUSE AT THE TIME THERE WERE TWO TAX PARCELS.
THOSE TWO TAX PARCELS WERE LATER CONSOLIDATED, BUT AT THAT TIME, THE TWO ZONING, EACH ZONING CASE APPLIED TO EACH TAX PARCEL AND THEY WERE ALSO REZONE.
ONE OF THEM WAS REZONED FROM M3 TO M1.
SO AGAIN, THE BACKGROUND IS THAT THERE WERE TWO ZONING CASES, AND AT THIS TIME, THERE'S ONLY NEED FOR ONE ZONING CASE BECAUSE THERE'S ONLY ONE TAX PARCEL.
THE TWO, PARCELS WERE CONSOLIDATED.
THE PRIMARY REASON THAT THEY'RE MAKING THIS REQUEST IS BECAUSE IN THOSE ZONING CASES, THERE WERE TWO VERY SPECIFIC USES THAT WERE EXCLUDED AND THE APPLICANT EXCLUDED THOSE USES THROUGH THEIR PROFFERS.
AND THE REASON THAT THEY EXCLUDED THEM WAS BECAUSE THOSE SPECIFIC USES WOULD HAVE TRIGGERED THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND A VERY SPECIFIC TYPE OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS.
A CHAPTER FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN.
AND THAT TYPE OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IS VERY INVOLVED AND AT THE TIME WOULD HAVE DELAYED THE REZONING CASE BY A NUMBER OF MONTHS, SO THE APPLICANT DECIDED TO KEEP THE CASE MOVING FORWARD. THEY WERE WILLING TO PROFFER OUT THOSE USES ON THIS PROPERTY.
AND SINCE THEN, THERE IS A NEW ADDITION OF A TECHNICAL MANUAL THAT NO LONGER HAS THAT SAME REQUIREMENT FOR THESE TYPE OF USES.
SO AT THE TIME, YOU KNOW, THOSE ZONING CASES IN 2020, THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THESE TYPE OF USES HERE YOUR HIGH CUBE FULFILLMENT WAREHOUSE HIGH CUBE, PARCEL HUB WAREHOUSE.
BUT LATER ON, THEY UPDATE THE FOLKS WHO DO THOSE MANUALS UPDATED THEM.
AND THERE WAS NO LONGER A NEED FOR THIS DETAILED ANALYSIS FOR THESE USES ON THIS PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT HAD SUBMITTED GENERATION EXPECTATIONS FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT AND BASED ON THAT DATA.
THE CURRENT BASED ON THAT DATA AND THE CURRENT MANUALS THAT IMPACT ANALYSIS IS NO LONGER REQUIRED. SO IN ORDER TO REMOVE THIS RESTRICTION ON THOSE PARTICULAR LAND USES, THE APPLICANT HAS APPLIED FOR THIS REZONING AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU TONIGHT AND IN ORDER TO REMOVE THOSE RESTRICTIONS.
I'VE NOW TALKED THROUGH THOSE GOALS, NUMBER ONE, REMOVE THE RESTRICTION ON THOSE TWO USES AND NUMBER TWO, CONSOLIDATE TWO ZONING CASES SO THAT THERE'S ONLY ONE.
AND SO THEIR REQUEST, THE WAY THAT THEY GO ABOUT THIS IS TO REMOVE THOSE LANGUAGE THAT EXCLUDES THOSE USES AND REPLACE THE TWO SETS OF CONDITIONS FOR TWO ZONING CASES WITH ONE SET OF CONDITION FOR ONE ZONING CASE AND ALL THE OTHER CONDITIONS THAT APPLIED IN THE THOSE PREVIOUS ZONING CASES WILL STILL APPLY UNDER THIS NEW SET OF CONDITIONS.
THIS IS A LAYOUT, GENERAL LAYOUT OF THE PROPERTY.
THIS WAS A CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT AGAIN, SINCE THEN, A BUILDING IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA WHERE YOU CAN SEE A PAD FOR A BUILDING.
THERE'S A PICTURE OF THE BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
IT'S VERY WIDE AT ALL ANGLES AND SO TOOK TWO PHOTOS TO GET IT IN VIEW THERE.
A STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING STAFF PRIMARY COMMENTS HERE WERE THAT JUST KEEP IN MIND THAT THE ZONING DISTRICT IS NOT PROPOSED TO CHANGE HERE.
ONLY THE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THOSE ADDITIONAL USES BEING ALLOWED ON THE PROPERTY BECAUSE THEY'RE ALREADY ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN ONE ZONING DISTRICT. AND BASED ON THIS PROPERTY, THERE DOESN'T SEEM
[00:15:09]
TO BE A NEED FOR ANY OTHER TYPE OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY.AND STAFF ALSO NOTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN A SITE PLAN SUBMITTED RECENTLY, WHICH IS UPDATING THE PLANS FOR THAT PROPERTY.
THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR A FUTURE EXPANSION OF THIS BUILDING TO ALMOST A MILLION SQUARE FEET. THIS REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THE STAFF FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS ARE APPROPRIATE.
THE ONLY OTHER DEPARTMENT WITH COMMENTS HERE WAS THE DATE AGENCY VDOT AND VDOT STATED THAT THEY AGREED THAT BASED ON THE UPDATED SITUATION, THE UPDATED TRIP GENERATION MAIL THAT PARTICULAR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS NO LONGER REQUIRED.
SO THEY'RE JUST CONFIRMING THAT.
AND THEY STATED THAT THE SITE PLAN SEEMS TO MEET THE VDOT STANDARDS, SO VDOT HAS NO OBJECTIONS. JUST TO LOOK AT THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS.
THEY ONLY CHANGED TWO CONDITIONS.
AND IT'S JUST CHANGED THE WORDING THERE.
CHANGED THE WORDING IN NUMBER TWO.
AND YOU CAN, OF COURSE, SEE THE THE FULL SET OF CONDITIONS ON PAGE THREE OF THE STAFF REPORT WHERE THERE'S A DRAFT ORDINANCE, BUT THEY CHANGED THE WORDING APPROPRIATELY THERE.
AND THE OTHER CONDITIONS THAT WILL REMAIN PERTAIN TO GENERAL CONFORMANCE, TO THAT CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND REQUIREMENT FOR VEGETATIVE BUFFERS AND SOME LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, AND THOSE REQUIREMENTS ARE ALL REVIEWED DURING SITE PLAN AND HAVE BEEN REVIEWED DURING SITE PLAN FOR THIS BUILDING.
THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THOSE PROFFERED CONDITIONS AND OUR BASIS IS THERE, WE STAFF ADVERTISE IT AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE CODE AND DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.
AT THIS POINT, I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE FOR STAFF AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND IS AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.
WAS THIS PROPERTY VACANT BEFORE THIS BUILDING WAS PUT ON IT? YES. ANY OTHER QUESTION? THE WATER CAPACITY.
I CAN'T SPEAK ON THE WATER CAPACITY, I CAN SAY THAT THE APPLICANT IS IS IN CONVERSATION WITH THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT ON WHAT CAPACITY IS THERE AND IF WE'LL BE ABLE TO SERVE THE NEEDS THAT THEY HAVE POTENTIAL USERS THAT THEY HAVE.
I DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL DETAIL ON THAT.
WHAT WILL THE WAREHOUSE BE USED FOR? IT CAN BE USED FOR ANY OF THE PERMITTED USES IN THE N1 ZONING DISTRICT.
IT'S I BELIEVE THIS WAS BUILT AS A SPEC BUILDING.
SO THE APPLICANT AND THE PROP, WHICH IS ALSO THE PROPERTY OWNER, CAN FIND A TENANT FOR THIS BUILDING. AT THE EXPENSE OF OVERSIMPLIFICATION, THE APPLICANT WANT TO TAKE TWO TAX PARCELS, DRAWING THEM INTO ONE TAX? THAT ALREADY OCCURRED. THAT'S THE FIRST PART OF THE QUESTION.
OKAY. AND THEN THEY WANT TO DO IN THAT ONE, YOU TAX PARTIAL ANYTHING THAT IS NOW ALLOWED N1. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. AND BUT THERE WAS ALSO A CAVEAT IN THERE THAT THEY BE ALLOWED TO DO ANYTHING ELSE IF THEY WANTED TO.
DID I MISS THAT? NO, THAT'S NOT CORRECT.
I THINK THERE'S JUST THE WORDING IN THE CONDITION IS JUST STATING SOMETHING THAT IS NOT IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE STATED.
IT'S JUST CHANGING THAT WORDING BECAUSE THERE WAS A PREVIOUS ZONING CASE THAT EXCLUDED CERTAIN USES. SO NOW THE WORDING OF THAT CONDITION, INSTEAD OF SAYING ALL USES EXCEPT FOR THESE ARE PERMITTED, IT NOW SAYS ALL N1 PERMITTED USES ARE PERMITTED.
ANYONE ELSE? THANK YOU. OK, THIS BEING A PUBLIC HEARING, I HEREBY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING
[00:20:01]
FOR ANYONE TO COME AND SPEAK THAT IS FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL BECOMES.STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND LIMIT YOUR TALK TO THREE MINUTES.
I'M REPRESENTING SI VIRGINIA TOO IN THIS MATTER THE PROPERTY OWNER AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE HOLLINGSWORTH COMPANIES HERE IN SOUTH POINT BUSINESS PARK FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS NOW, AND THIS IS BY FAR THE LARGEST BUILDING WE'VE BUILT IN SOUTH POINT AND WE'RE EXCITED THAT IT IS COMING TO FRUITION AND WE HAVE QUITE A BIT OF INTEREST IN THE FACILITY.
AND SO WE JUST THINK THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE ABLE TO GET TENANTS INTO THE BUILDING WHEN THEY'RE READY TO TAKE IT.
WE HAD THESE PROFFERS BEFORE AND WE WERE IN THE PROCESS OF STARTING THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND WHEN WE APPROACHED TIMMINS TO DO THAT FOR US SO THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO WAIT IN THE CASE OF A TENANT SHOWING UP, THEY SAID, WELL, ACTUALLY, NOW YOU DON'T EVEN REACH THE THRESHOLD THAT WOULD NEED IT.
SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE COMING TO YOU NOW TO GET THAT CLEANED UP SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTION MOVING FORWARD AS WE LOOK TO PUT A TENANT IN THE BUILDING.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? ANYONE ON ZOOM? THERE'S NO ONE ON ZOOM, THERE BEING NO ONE ELSE.
I HEREBY CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TURN IT OVER TO COMMISSIONERS.
THERE A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD REQUESTS RZ 21-06 TO THE BOARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE PROPER CONDITIONS AND THE REASONS FOR THIS RECOMMENDATION.
MOTION AND SECOND. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL.
YES. MRS. BRESKO. YES. MR. BRESKO. YES.
YES. NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION SE-21-07 REQUEST A BRIGHT VIEW LLC PURSUANT TO PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 990-393 [INAUDIBLE] TO PERMIT A SPECIAL CARE HOSPITAL IN A B1 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING OUTPATIENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES IN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING.
GOOD EVENING, AND I WILL DO THE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING.
THE FIRST MAP IS [INAUDIBLE] SHOWING WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED OFF, OF COURSE [INAUDIBLE].
THE NEXT MAP THAT YOU SEE IS THE ZONING MAP, SO THAT MOST OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES ARE ZONED B1 GENERAL BUSINESS AND THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES.
THAT IS ZONE R2 WHICH IS RIGHT ON JEFFERSON PARK ROAD.
IN THE NEXT MAP SHOWS THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE SITE.
[00:25:02]
AND THE BUILDING THAT THE COMPANY WHICH IS LEASED IS HAS A RED X ON IT. NEXT, I WOULD SOME BACKGROUND BRIGHTVIEW LLC OFFICE, OUTPATIENT MEDICATION ASSISTED TREATMENT FOR FULL FOR DRUG ADDICTION.THEY OPERATE ON FIFTY FOUR LOCATIONS ACROSS FIVE STATES.
IN THE FIVE STATES BEING VIRGINIA, KENTUCKY, DELAWARE, OHIO, AND NORTH CAROLINA.
THE SEVEN SITES HERE IN THE COMMONWEALTH ARE IN LYNCHBURG, MIDLOTHIAN, NEWPORT NEWS, SUFFOLK, AND THEY HAVE TWO SITES IN CHESAPEAKE.
IN THE APPLICANTS REQUEST CAN BE SUMMARIZED AS FOLLOWS THEY WISH TO LEASE A SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SQUARE FEET OF SPACE AND IN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING. THEY ARE THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS PLANNED. THEY WILL CREATE AT LEAST 10 FULL TIME JOBS.
THERE WILL ONLY BE SEVEN PATIENTS ON SITE AT ANY GIVEN TIME.
THE FULL PARKING LOAD IS SEVENTEEN SPACES.
THE HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE 8 A.M.
MONDAY THRU FRIDAY AND A WISH TO STAY OPEN TO 7:00 TO ACCOMMODATE EVENING GROUP SESSIONS FOR PEOPLE THAT'S HOLDING A FULL-TIME JOB AND THE APPLICANTS REQUESTS FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A SPECIAL CARE HOSPITAL AND THE DEFINITION OF A [INAUDIBLE] OF A SPECIAL CARE HOSPITAL IS A INSTITUTION RENDERING CARE FOR PRIMARILY FOR MENTAL OR [INAUDIBLE] MINDED PATIENTS, EPILEPTIC, ALCOHOLICS, OR DRUG ADDICTS.
THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, THE VIEW OF THE BUILDING, WHICH SHOWS A EARTHEN BERM WITH TREES.
AND [INAUDIBLE] PROVIDED A RENDERING OF THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, WHICH SHOWS THE WAITING ROOM, THE GROUP THERAPY ROOM, THE INTERNAL WAITING ROOM, HALLWAYS AND THE DOCTORS OFFICES.
THE NEXT ARE PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF COMMENTS.
[INAUDIBLE] THAT THE USE WILL HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND THE RESIDENCES.
THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL COMPLEX HAS AMPLE OFF STREET PARKING SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE COMMERCIAL, A VACANT LOT ZONED COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, OTHER APPROVALS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED BY THE APPLICANT IS THEY MUST OBTAIN A CHANGE OF USE FOR THE BUILDING, AND THEY MUST RECEIVE
[00:30:09]
LICENSES FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, AND THEY MUST OBTAIN A LOCAL BUSINESS LICENSE FROM PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY.THE PROPOSAL SEEMS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY FOR A BUSINESS CONVENTION SITE AND THEIR EXISTING EARTHEN BERM WITH TREES TO BUFFER THE USE FROM ADJACENT ON [INAUDIBLE]. OTHER REVIEW COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTIONS OFFICE, BASICALLY THAT ENTAILS WHAT CHANGES TO THE STRUCTURE HAS TO BE MADE TO MAKE IT MEET THE BUILDING CODE AND THE QUESTION WAS [INAUDIBLE] BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ABOUT WHETHER MEDICINE WOULD BE HELD UP ON SITE, AND AT THAT TIME, THE ANSWER WAS NO.
BUT A FEW WEEKS AGO, THE APPLICANT HAD CONTACTED STAFF.
AND THEY DO WISH TO KEEP MEDICATION ON THE PROPERTY AND STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED SEVERAL CONDITIONS TO BE TIED TO ANY APPROVAL, AND THE CONDITIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
THE HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL BE FROM 8 A.M.
TO 7 P.M. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE ALLOWED TO STORE AND DISPENSE MEDICATION ON SITE.
THE MEDICATION SHALL BE STORED IN A TWENTY FIVE HUNDRED POUNDS SAFE.
IN A BADGE ACCESS, ANY ROOM THAT IS UNDER TWENTY FOUR HOURS SURVEILLANCE BY INTERNAL CAMERAS, THE APPLICANTS HAVE TO ADHERE TO THE REGULATIONS OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, THE DEA AND THE VIRGINIA BOARD OF PHARMACY, AND THEY MUST COMPLY WITH THE ANNUAL INSPECTIONS.
THE APPLICANT HAS TO CHANGE HAS TO OBTAIN A CHANGE OF VIEW IN A [INAUDIBLE] . AND THEN APPLICANT ALSO MUST OBTAIN ALL THE LICENSES AND PERMITS FOR OPERATION OF AN OUTPATIENT DRUG ADDICTION SERVICE FACILITY, AND ALSO THE LAST ONE IS THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO LOITERING ALLOWED AFTER THE FACILITY IS CLOSED FOR BUSINESS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION ONCE AGAIN IS A APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IN THE BASIS IS THAT THE REQUEST APPEARS COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES, NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY STAFF. AS A WRITING OF THE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS WILL PROVIDE A MEANS FOR THE YOUTH NOT TO BECOME A PUBLIC NUISANCE.
AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION.
[00:35:01]
QUESTIONS ANYONE? I GUESS I JUST HAVE ONE OR TWO.AT ONE PLACE, YOU SAY THERE WOULD BE NO DRUGS OR MEDICATIONS DISPENSED IN THE BUILDING.
IN ANOTHER CASE, YOU SAY THERE ARE GOING TO BE MEDICATIONS IN THE BUILDING, BUT THERE'LL BE UNDER LOCK AND KEY.
NOW WHICH IS IT? THEY WILL BE ALLOWED TO STORE MEDICATION THERE UNDER LOCK AND KEY.
ONCE THE STAFF REPORT WAS FIRST WRITTEN, THEY THEY STATED THAT NO DRUGS WOULD BE STORED THERE. THEY CHANGED THEIR MIND AND ASKED FOR THAT TO BE CHANGED.
OKAY. AND MY SECOND QUESTION? HAVE YOU DONE ANY FIELD WORK OR HOMEWORK TO SEE HOW THESE TYPES OF FACILITIES PAY OUT IN TERMS OF DRUG USE HANGING AROUND AND CAUSING SOME BAD PUBLICITY IN THAT AREA? NO, I HAVE NOT.
YOU HAVE NOT DONE ANY HOMEWORK, OK.
BUT I DID REACH OUT TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCY, AND SHE STATED IN THAT HAVING DRUGS AT THAT SITE WOULD POSE NO MORE OF A RISK OF A LOCAL PHARMACY, HAVING THOSE TYPES OF. BECAUSE THERE'S A RESTAURANT GOING UP OR IN THAT AREA RIGHT NOW.
AND WE CERTAINLY WOULDN'T WANT THIS NEW FACILITY TO PROVIDE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK FOR THAT RESTAURANT. BUT THE REQUEST WAS RAN BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND NO ONE, YOU KNOW, THEY DID [INAUDIBLE].
DID THE OWNER OF A RESTAURANT GET A LETTER? THE OWNER OF THE RESTAURANT THAT IS A TENANT LEASE, SO, THE OWNER.
OF THE BUILDING IS THE SAME OWNER THAT OWNS THIS BUILDING.
ALL RIGHT, SO THE OWNER IS HERE.
SO THE OWNER GOT A LETTER OUT THERE, A PROPRIETOR, NOT THE LEASE [INAUDIBLE] THE RESTAURANT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. THERE'S BEING A PUBLIC HEARING.
I HEREBY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS CASE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST IT COME FORWARD, STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND LIMIT TALK TO THREE MINUTES.
YES, SIR. COMMISSIONERS, MY NAME IS NICK WALKER.
I'M WITH ROSLYN FARM CORPORATION.
WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE BUILDING OF BOTH BUILDINGS THAT ARE THIS PROPERTY.
WE HAVE THE [INAUDIBLE] RESTAURANT THAT JUST OPENED UP LAST NIGHT.
I HAVE TALKED TO THE OWNERS OF [INAUDIBLE] ABOUT THIS TENANT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION MR. SIMMONS, AND HE WAS AWARE OF WHAT'S GOING ON BESIDE BESIDE HIM IN THE ADJACENT BUILDING.
HE WAS FINE WITH IT AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
WE CERTAINLY DO SUPPORT THIS USE AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
I DO HAVE THE TENANT HERE AS WELL.
WHO [INAUDIBLE] WITH BRIGHTVIEW, WHO CAN PROBABLY ANSWER THE MORE TECHNICAL QUESTIONS? WHAT WILL BE HAPPENING INSIDE THAT BUILDING IF YOU DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS MIKE [INAUDIBLE] VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT FOR BRIGHTVIEW, OBVIOUSLY IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST, BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE, LIKE NICK HAD SAID ANY DETAILS THAT YOU NEED SOME ADDITIONAL RESPONSES ON THEM.
I'M HAPPY TO PROVIDE SOME SUPPORT THERE.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. AND NO QUESTIONS? IS THERE ANYONE ON ZOOM FOR THIS? NO SIR, NO ONE ON ZOOM. THERE BEING NO ONE ELSE.
I HEREBY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TURN IT OVER TO THE COMMISSIONERS FOR YOUR WISHES.
[00:40:16]
OPEN FOR A MOTION.THIS REQUEST DOES NOT COME WITHOUT SOME RISK.
IN TERMS OF WHAT? NOT THAT I'M AGAINST THE REQUEST, BUT JUST TO HOPE THAT WHO WILL BE OPERATING THAT UNIT? THAT WILL TAKE INTO MIND THAT THEY DO HAVE NEIGHBORS AND EVERYTHING THAT GOES ON AS FAR AS TREATMENT IS CONCERNED, ACTIVITIES IS A CONCERN HAVE TO GO ON INSIDE OF THAT BUILDING.
THAT'S ALL. YOU NEED TO ACCEPT THE MOTION.
MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT THE [INAUDIBLE] REQUEST SE21-07 TO THE BOARD WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE SENATE RECOMMENDATION STAFF REPORT IS COMPATIBLE WITH A [INAUDIBLE].
A MOTION. IS THEIR SECOND? I SECOND. THANK YOU MS. ELDER. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
YES. NEXT ON THE AGENDA, WE HAVE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION, SE22-01 REQUEST OF DUNCAN AND SUZANNE [INAUDIBLE] PURSUANT TO PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY ZONING AUDIENCE ORDINANCE SECTION 90-103-9 TO PERMIT AN ASSEMBLY HALL WITHIN THE R.A.
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT.
GOOD EVENING, ONCE AGAIN, I'M HERE TO PRESENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION 22-1 . THE FIRST MAP THAT YOU ARE LOOKING AT [INAUDIBLE] IN A PROPERTY THAT'S IN QUESTION IS OUTLINED IN A RED.
IN THE SECOND MAP THAT YOU'RE SEEING IS THE ZONING MAP.
PUBLIC PROPERTY ZONES RA RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
IN THE NEXT MAP IS SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND IT'S SHOWING THE ACCESS ROAD FOR FOR THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS LAKE FARM ROAD AND THAT IS OUTLINED IN RED AND LAKE FARM ROAD, CONNECTS WITH ROBIN ROAD AND IT GOES THROUGH MR. FUNG'S PROPERTY ALL THE WAY OVER TO WHERE THE VENUE IS GOING TO BE FOR WEDDINGS.
THE BACKGROUND FOR THESE CASES, THE APPLICANT BUILT A RESIDENTIAL DWELLING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE YEAR OF 2020, IN A YEAR OF 2021.
IN THE EXISTING DWELLING HAS FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SQUARE FEET OF SPACE.
APPLICANTS HAVE STATED THAT THEY WISH TO USE THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED BUILDING AS A WEDDING VENUE, THAT THERE WOULD BE FOUR TO EIGHT EVENTS MONTHLY, MOSTLY ON FRIDAYS AND SATURDAYS.
THE EVENT OPERATION WILL BE FROM 12 P.M.
THE VENUE WHEN IT'S NOT IN USE.
THE VENUE WILL BE LOCKED AND CURRENTLY, THEY ARE TWO RESTROOMS AND ONE WARMING KITCHEN INSIDE THE STRUCTURE.
THE ADVOCATES HAVE STATED THAT THERE WILL BE NO COOKING OR DISHWASHING DONE AT THE VENUE
[00:45:03]
AND THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF WEDDING GUESTS.WILL BE LIMITED TO ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY PERSONS THAT THERE IS A LARGE GRAVEL AREA TO ACCOMMODATE SEVENTY PLUS CARS.
THAT THERE WILL BE NO EMPLOYEES IN THAT THE EVENT HOST WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CATERING, SERVING, CLEANED UP, SET UP, ET CETERA.
ANY ACCESS ROUTE FOR THE ASSEMBLY HALL WILL BE TO THE SOUTHEAST VIA LAKE FARMS ROAD.
BUT FOR THE CURRENT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING THAT THERE IS A SECOND ACCESS POINT ON [INAUDIBLE] GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
CURRENTLY, THERE IS A SEPTIC CAPACITY TO SERVE ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY PEOPLE.
AN APPLICANT HAS GOTTEN A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING REPORT DONE WHICH WOULD UPGRADE THAT CAPACITY FROM ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY PERSONS TO UP TO ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY.
THE NEXT PICTURES THAT YOU SEE SHOWS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE THAT THE APPLICANT WISHES TO USE TO HOLD WEDDINGS.
IN THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE INTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW, STAFF COMMENTS, EXPECTED IMPACT ARE EXPECTED TO BE MINIMAL [INAUDIBLE] THERE WILL BE MINIMUM TRAFFIC AND NOISE DOING EVENTS, AND THIS WILL BE MITIGATED BY THE FACT THAT THE STRUCTURE IS ALMOST HALF A MILE OFF OF ROBIN ROAD. THE SITE IS SURROUNDED BY WOODLANDS.
THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY IS MOSTLY OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
IN THE CONDITIONS THE STAFF HAS PROPOSED WILL SERVE TO FURTHER MITIGATE ANY.
ON OTHER APPROVALS AND PERMITS THAT THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE TO OBTAIN, THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE AN ENGINEER TO DO A SITE PLAN FOR THE BUILDING AND SITE, THEY WOULD NEED A CHANGE OF USE PERMIT FROM THE BUILDING OFFICE, THEY WILL NEED TO INSTALL A COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF VDOT.
AND THEY ALSO NEED A PERMIT FROM THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO UPGRADE THE WELL INTO UPGRADE THE SEPTIC. IN THE COMPATIBILITY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE BUILDING RESEMBLES AN AGRICULTURAL [INAUDIBLE], AND IT IS RUSTIC IN NATURE.
OTHERS STAFF [INAUDIBLE] BUILDING INSPECTIONS OFFICE JUST STATED THE CHANGES TO THE BUILDING WILL BE NEEDED TO CHANGE IT FROM A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE TO A.
ASSEMBLY [INAUDIBLE] AND VDOT STATED THE NEED FOR COMMERCIAL INTERESTS AND OF COURSE, THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS GOTTEN THE PE REPORT.
AND THAT IS WAITING TO BE REVIEWED NOW AND AS FAR AS THE
[00:50:08]
ENVIRONMENTAL AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE ANY LAND OR SERVICE OVER 10,000 SQUARE FEET WOULD REQUIRE A LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY AND ALSO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE OVER ONE ACRE, YOU WOULD HAVE TO GET A PERMIT FROM [INAUDIBLE]. AND THE REAL ESTATE [INAUDIBLE] OFFICE.JUST STATED THAT THE STRUCTURE HAD ISN'T APPROVED FOR A COMMERCIAL USE YET, AND THAT IF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS GRANTED, THE PROPERTY WILL BE SUBJECT TO ROLL BACK [INAUDIBLE].
AND THESE ARE SOME HIGHLIGHTS OF THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS, THE HOURS OF OPERATION MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FROM NOON UNTIL 10:00 P.M.
ALL WEDDING CEREMONIES MUST CONCLUDE BY 7:00 P.M.
ALL RECEPTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE INDOORS AND THIS INCLUDES DANCING AND MUSIC, [INAUDIBLE] SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO LAKE FARM ROAD AND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PARKING AND THERE SHOULD BE NO ONSITE PREPARATION OF FOOD OR DISHWASHING AND THAT ONE FREE STANDING SIGN UP TO 60 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE WILL BE ALLOWED ON THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF VDOT RIGHT AWAY, AND THE APPLICANTS MUST FIRST OBTAIN OR REQUIRED PERMITS AND CERTIFICATION. AFTER I WROTE ON THE STAFF REPORT, I THOUGHT OF THREE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AND I CONTACTED THE APPLICANT IN [INAUDIBLE] AS A PROBLEM WITH THE THREE EXTRA CONDITIONS, AND THOSE ARE THE APPLICANT SHALL POSSESS AND MAINTAIN LIABILITY INSURANCE AND AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN ONE MILLION DOLLARS AND THAT OCCUPANCY SHALL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN A HUNDRED AND FIFTY PERSONS PER EVENT.
AND THE LAST ONE WAS THAT A SAFE PLAN HAS TO BE PREPARED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE [INAUDIBLE] OR THE CHANGE OF USE APPLICATION.
AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL.
AND THE BASIS IS THAT THE REQUEST APPEARS COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES THERE HAS BEEN NO NEGATIVE COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE TIME THAT THE STAFF REPORT WAS WRITTEN AND THAT THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS TO SERVE AS TO MAKE THIS USE NOT TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE.
AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
ANY QUESTIONS? I JUST HAVE TO QUESTION.
ON YOUR STAFF REPORT YOU SAY THAT THE APPLICANT IS GONNA INSTALL SEPTIC FACILITIES TO HANDLE UP TO ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY PEOPLE AND ON THE ORDINANCE PROPOSAL, YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE APPLICANT WILL GET IN CHARGE TO GET IN TOUCH WITH THE COUNTY POLICE IF THE PARTY IS MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY? MM HMM. BUT YOU CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY BECAUSE HE'S ALREADY IMPOSED ON HIMSELF THAT THE MAXIMUM IS ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY.
[00:55:03]
I THOUGHT I HAD.I THOUGHT I HAD STRICKEN THAT PART OUT ABOUT CONTACTING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
BECAUSE THAT WOULDN'T BE NECESSARY BECAUSE THE CONDITION HAS BEEN ADDED ON THAT.
I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
ARE YOU SAYING HE CAN HAVE MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY? IF I LEFT IN THE CONDITION TO CONTACT THE POLICE, IF HE WAS GOING TO HAVE OVER ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY PEOPLE, I HAD MEANT TO STRIKE THAT OUT.
BECAUSE THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT WOULD SAY YOU CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN A HUNDRED AND FIFTY.
OKAY. PLUS, I JUST ADDED A CONDITION STATING THAT YOU CAN'T, HE CAN'T HAVE MORE THAN A HUNDRED AND FIFTY. OK, THAT WAS AN OVERSIGHT ON LAST PART.
OK. AND THE USE OR THE LACK OF USE OF ALCOHOL IS NOT MENTIONED.
BUT AT LEAST THAT I COULD SEE.
THAT'S IN CONDITION NUMBER 12, ABOUT THE ABC PERMIT BEING NEEDED.
ANYONE ELSE? THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
I HEREBY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ANYONE TO COME FORWARD TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS SPECIAL EXCEPTION.
COME FORWARD, SPEAK YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND LIMIT YOUR TIME TO THREE MINUTES.
GOOD EVENING, BRIAN HAYES, I LIVE AT NINE THOUSAND FIVE GOLF COURSE DRIVE, THE ENTRANCE TO THAT PROPERTY MAILBOX IS SITTING RIGHT BESIDE MINE AT NINETY NINETY NINE.
THE WEDDING THAT WAS TAKING PLACE LAST SUMMER FOR HIS SON THAT TRAFFIC CAME RIGHT BY MY HOUSE AND ALL THE WAY THROUGH MY ALL THE WAY DOWN THE EDGE OF MY PROPERTY.
OH, THE QUALITY OF OUR LIFE AT FOUR TO EIGHT OF THESE EVENTS MONTHLY WOULD RUIN OUR QUALITY OF LIFE, WE MOVED TO THE COUNTRY FOR PEACE AND QUIET.
AND WHEN WE HAVE TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF MY RIGHT BESIDE MY HOUSE, MY PROPERTY, THE DRIVEWAY RUNS TO MY NEIGHBOR'S DRIVEWAY, BUT IT RUNS DOWN TO MY WHOLE PROPERTY ALL THE WAY BACK TO HIS PROPERTY.
WE HAD WHEN THEY BUILT THE PLACE, I HAD TO KEEP MY DOGS IN THE HOUSE OR ON A LEASH.
I WAS WORRIED ABOUT HIM RUNNING DOWN THE DRIVEWAY.
THEY'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR 12 YEARS, AS OLD AS THEY'VE BEEN WORRIED ABOUT THEM GETTING RUN OVER. MY GRANDCHILDREN OUT THERE, PLAYING ON THE DRIVE WANT TO TRY.
SO WE'VE GOT TO WORRY ABOUT HER GETTING RUN OVER.
MY NEIGHBOR'S FIVE YEAR OLD CAN'T PLAY IN THE DRIVEWAY.
UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT IT WOULD BE A HUGE IMPACT ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE THAT PEOPLE LIVE AROUND THERE WITH THE MUSIC, THE NOISE.
IT'S NOT A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS, IT'S RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL.
I WOULD ASK THAT YOU VOTE NO ON THIS.
I DON'T THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
ME PERSONALLY, I WOULD HAVE NEVER BOUGHT THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE.
I'VE GOT ALL THESE PERMISSIONS FIRST BEFORE I SPENT THE MONEY TO BUILD THAT BEAUTIFUL PLACE RIGHT THERE.
I WOULDN'T INVEST AT THAT KIND OF MONEY, THEN COME BACK AND ASK FOR PERMISSION.
CAN I MAKE THIS A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY? SO I'M MAKING MONEY OFF OF IT IN A RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT.
IF YOU WANT TO PUT COWS BACK THERE, THAT'S FINE.
THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR. WE'RE IN THE COUNTRY, BUT I DON'T SEE RUNNING THE BUSINESS OUT OF MY BACKYARD OR MY NEIGHBOR'S BACKYARD.
I JUST THINK IT WOULD BE A BAD MOVE.
THEY SAY THEY'RE GOING TO USE [INAUDIBLE] DRIVE.
WHO'S GOING TO POLICE THAT? THE ADDRESS IS 9099 IS GOING TO COME RIGHT BY MY HOUSE.
[01:00:03]
WHEN THEY GET DRUNK AND LEAVE, THEY'RE GOING TO RUN THROUGH MY YARD LIKE THEY DID LAST TIME, RIGHT DOWN THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY WHERE THEY MISSED THE CURVE COMING AROUND.I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA, AND I APPRECIATE YOU ALL HEARING ME OUT, AND I HOPE YOU VOTE. NO. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? THIRTY ONE YEARS.
NAME IS CLAYTON [INAUDIBLE], OWNER OF NINE ZERO NINE FIVE GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
AS MR. HAYES PRETTY MUCH SUMMED IT UP SINCE HE'S BEEN BUILT THE VENUE OR AS HE WAS BUILDING IT ALL THE CONSTRUCTION THAT'S COME THROUGH THE DRIVEWAY, WHICH WE SHARE ON A ROAD AGREEMENT. AS I THOUGHT THE ROAD AGREEMENT WAS BETWEEN ME AND MR. AND MRS. [INAUDIBLE] AS A YOU KNOW, JUST A PERSONAL THING BETWEEN, YOU KNOW, US, NOT SOMETHING HE COULD RUN A BUSINESS DOWN.
AND SINCE THE START OF THIS, EVERY PIECE OF LUMBER, EVERY PIECE OF EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN BROUGHT DOWN THE ROAD IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE.
YOU KNOW. I'M NOT FOR IT, NOT THAT, YOU KNOW, I CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT, BUT I JUST FIGURED I'D COME HERE AND STATE AND AS OF NOW, HE'S USED THE ROAD WE SHARE TO DO EVERYTHING HE'S DONE AT THAT BUILDING.
I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME'S EDDIE JONES.
I'M A STAY UP IN THE UNDERWATER TUNNEL, NOT TOO FAR FROM THEM.
I WON'T SURE OF WHERE THE PROPERTY WAS AT FIRST, BUT IT IS KIND OF LIKE BACK WHERE I BELIEVE, I THINK WITH DONALD.
I STAY RIGHT WHEN YOU COME AROUND THROUGH THE TUNNEL.
AND RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE VERY MUCH TRAFFIC, HIGHER TRAFFIC COMING AROUND THROUGH THERE, LIKE FAST AT TIMES.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA.
YOU KNOW, IF I, YOU KNOW, HAVING THEM OR GETTING DRUNK, I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO GO OUT.
YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH, BUT I DON'T THINK PERSONALLY, I'M IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, SO I DON'T KNOW ABOUT TRAVELING UP AND DOWN THE HIGHWAY.
FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY DON'T HAVE A YELLOW STRIPE COME DOWN AND I THINK IT STOPPED AT THE GOLF COURSE. THEY DON'T CONTINUE THAT YELLOW LINE MIDDLE LINE ON DOWN TO THE TUNNEL FOR WHATEVER REASON THEY KNOW THEY HAVE DON'T DO THAT.
BUT I WOULD SAY, GIVE IT SOME THOUGHT ABOUT IT AND MAKE SURE SOME, YOU KNOW, ALL THE P'S AND Q'S ARE CORRECT BEFORE WE TURN IT LOOSE, YOU KNOW? I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND WHERE THEY ARE RIGHT THERE AT IT.
THANK YOU, MR. JONES. CAN I HAVE YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE? CAN I HAVE YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE? NO PROBLEM. NINE EIGHT ONE TEN GOLF COURSE.
ANYONE ELSE? I JUST HAVE A QUESTION.
IS LAKE FARM ROAD, IS THAT AN EASEMENT, DEDICATED ROAD OR WHAT? IT'S BELONGS TO MR. [INAUDIBLE], BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWO DIFFERENT WAYS OF GETTING INTO THAT PLACE. I KNOW.
THE ISSUES THAT EVERYBODY HAS SPOKEN TO SO FAR, IS THAT GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
THAT COME OFF OF GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
LAKE FARM ROAD COMES OFF OF ROBIN ROBIN ROAD.
OK, SO NOBODY'S TALKING ABOUT ROBIN ROAD.
MR. [INAUDIBLE]. COULD YOU COME AND EXPLAIN TO US? YEAH, THE SITUATION IS THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT ON GOLF COURSE DRIVE AND THEN TURNED UP.
THAT'S THOUSANDS OF FEET AWAY.
MY ACTUAL LOCATION, MY PROPOSAL IS CAME THE ROAD TO [INAUDIBLE] ROAD, CAME FROM MY OWN ROAD ON ROBINS ROAD AND NOTHING.
THE ROAD THAT GO INTO MY VENUE FROM GOLF COURSE DRIVE WILL BE LOCKED DURING THE EVENT.
[01:05:02]
I MEAN, NO PEOPLE CAN IN.DO YOU USE THAT DRIVE FOR YOUR HOME? YEAH, NOT MY REGULAR HOME, FOR MY THAT LOCATION, THAT BARN WAS A BARN STYLE HOME THAT I BUILT FOR MY SON. IT WAS A RESIDENTIAL.
I GET A CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY FOR THAT IS A HOUSE, RIGHT? DURING CONSTRUCTION, YES, WE DO USE THE ONLY ROAD TO GET INTO THAT PROPERTY, WHICH IS FROM THE GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
BUT THEN AFTER THAT, WE CHANGED THE [INAUDIBLE] JUST TRYING TO DO IT AND WE DETERMINED WE CARE ABOUT THE NEIGHBORS.
WE DON'T WANT TO USE THE GOLF CLUB DRIVE GOING TO THE VENUE INSTEAD USING MY OWN ROAD FROM ROBINS ROAD. AND THAT'S THE WHOLE CHANGE EVERYTHING, THEY'RE CONCERNED.
SO YOU'RE SAYING YOU'RE NOT GOING TO USE THE ROAD OFF GOLF? RIGHT. [INAUDIBLE] THE REASON WHY THEY HEARD ABOUT THE NOISE BECAUSE I DID USE THAT HOUSE FOR MY SON'S WEDDING, AND THAT'S THE ONLY TIME.
AND THEN ANOTHER ONE IS FOR MY NIECE MEMORIAL SERVICE THAT I USE FOR PRIVATELY USED.
RIGHT. I DO REALIZE THAT THAT'S PART OF THE ISSUE.
THAT'S WHY MY CONCERN TO THEM WAS RATHER THAN USING THAT ROAD AS A MAIN ENTRANCE, I WILL BLOCK THAT ROAD DURING ANY EVENT TO HAPPEN.
WE WILL PUT POP ASIDE TO TELL PEOPLE THERE'S NOT A ROAD TO COME IN.
OF COURSE, WHEN WE DO THE WEDDING, THOSE THE CLIENTS, THEY WILL HAVE SENT OUT INVITATION TO THEIR GUESTS.
ON THE INVITATION, WHICH STATED FROM MY FROM 1999 LAKE FARMS ROAD WHICH IS MY OWN RESIDENCE. THAT'S HOW THEY COME IN BY GOOGLE.
THEY WON'T HAVE AN ADDRESS GOLF COURSE? RIGHT. YEAH. YEAH, THEY WOULDN'T ONLY EMERGENCY FIRE TRUCK POLICE DEPARTMENT.
WE CALL THEM. IF WE GIVE THEM THE ADDRESS, THEY WILL COME THROUGH THE GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
OTHER THAN THAT FOR THE EVENT.
ALL THE PEOPLE INVITING GUESTS WILL GO THROUGH GOLF.
WILL NOT BE USING THAT ROAD AT ALL.
BUT IS THERE ANY WHEN? YOU HAVE TO USE THAT ROAD TO GET TO YOUR RESIDENCE? FOR MY OWN RESIDENT? NO, I'M USING.
NO, I'M TALKING ABOUT YOUR NEIGHBORS, DO THEY? DO Y'ALL USE THE OFF A GOLF COURSE TO GET TO YOUR PROPERTY? SO THERE'S NO, THERE'S NO WAY THAT THAT ROAD COULD BE BLOCKED OFF AT THE ROAD WITHOUT STOPPING Y'ALL FROM GOING TO YOUR HOUSES.
SO THE EVENTS HE SAID HE HAD ALREADY, HE'S BROUGHT THEM THROUGH THAT ROAD.
TO YOUR ROAD. RIGHT. HE STATED HE HAD NO OTHER WAY TO THAT BUILDING BUT NOW HE DOES.
YOU KNOW. LAKE FARM ROAD HAS BEEN THERE A LONG TIME.
ROAD BECAUSE IT WAS [INAUDIBLE].
I USED TO FARM THAT PROPERTY, SO I KNOW THE ROAD, THE ROAD'S BEEN THERE FOR YEARS.
DURING CONSTRUCTION, BECAUSE WHEN YOU PUT THE ADDRESS IN THERE, BECAUSE THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE COUNTY TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL HOME.
BASED ON 9099 GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
BY GOOGLE, ALL THE CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY WILL BASED ON 9099 GOLF CLUB DRIVE.
THAT'S HOW THEY DELIVER IT. THAT'S WHY THEY'VE BEEN USING THAT ROAD TO GO TO THAT SITE TO DO CONSTRUCTION. THEY COULD HAVE USED LAKE FARMS ROAD RIGHT THEN THEY CAN'T FIND MY SITE.
THAT WAS THE VERY BEGINNING WHEN WE USED THAT [INAUDIBLE] ROAD GO TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BECAUSE ALL THE [INAUDIBLE] EQUIPMENT ARE [INAUDIBLE] CONTRACTORS.
BUT THEN WHAT IS THE ADDRESS OF THIS GOING TO BE? THAT VENUE IS 9999 GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
I'M SORRY, YOU'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE TRAFFIC USING GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
IF OTHERWISE, THAT ADDRESS NEEDS TO BE LAKE FARM ROAD.
CORRECT. THAT'S THE REASON WHY ALL THE [INAUDIBLE] THAT WE POST FOR THAT VENUE, WE'RE USING 9999 LAKE FARMS ROAD.
ALL THE PUBLIC INFORMATION WILL BE USED IN 9999 LAKE FARMS ROAD AT THE SAME TIME.
OH, SORRY. WHAT MR. [INAUDIBLE] COULD DO IS REQUEST.
ONE SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM IS THAT MR. [INAUDIBLE] COULD ASK THE COUNTY TO CHANGE THEIR ADDRESS FROM GOLF COURSE DRIVE TO THE LAKE FARMS ROAD WHICH WOULD SOLVE THE PROPERTY BEING 9909 GOLF COURSE DRIVE. SO, YOU KNOW, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO?
[01:10:01]
YEAH, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO THAT.YEAH, I WOULD LIKE TO. WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO CHANGE? I MEAN, TO TRY TO CHANGE THE ADDRESS? YEAH. IF THEY ALLOW TO, YOU KNOW, THEN I DON'T KNOW HOW THE.
HMM. IF YOU GO ON GOOGLE MAPS, IT ALREADY SHOWS A 9909 LAKE FARM ROAD, WHICH LOOKS LIKE IT'S A DIFFERENT RESIDENCE, HIS HOUSE.
SO YOU WOULD HAVE TO GET A DIFFERENT, YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO USE 9999 LAKE FARM.
YOU HAVE TO ACTUALLY CHANGE THE ADDRESS.
YEAH. IS THIS LIKELY TO BECOME AN ISSUE AGAIN WHEN THEY DEVELOPED THE GOLF COURSE AT THE HOMES? THE USE OF GOLF COURSE DRIVE? I DON'T THINK [INAUDIBLE] GOLF COURSE DRIVE HAVE DIFFERENT [INAUDIBLE].
THAT PROPERTY IS MUCH BIGGER THAN THE HOMES THAT ARE JUST GOING TO BE BUILT ON ONTO A GOLF COURSE DRIVE. THERE'S GOING TO BE HOMES BEHIND IT NOW.
MAYBE THEY'LL BUILD AN ENTRANCE OFF GOLF COURSE DRIVE, I DON'T KNOW.
I MEAN, THE THING OF IT IS THE ROAD THAT COMES IN WHOSE LAND ACTUALLY, WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE LAND. FOR THE ROAD? YEAH, WE'RE OFF A GOLF COURSE ROAD WHERE THE ROADS COMING IN.
IS THAT IS THE EASEMENT? OR EASEMENT FOR WHO FOR YOU OR FOR? YES. OK, WELL, I MEAN, BUT WHOSE LAND IS IT DEEDED TO? YOU OK, SO YOU JUST HAVE AN EASEMENT TO COME IN THERE? YEAH, PRINCE GEORGE COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES.
BECAUSE I USED TO OWN THAT PROPERTY TOO, I SOLD IT TO THEM.
[INAUDIBLE] BUT THEY ARE THE SECOND.
I BOUGHT IT FROM [INAUDIBLE] AND DANIEL. WELL, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, EASEMENTS AREN'T GRANTED TO INDIVIDUAL WHEN YOU WHEN YOU ESTABLISH AN EASEMENT THAT ALMOST BECOMES PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PRIVATE EASEMENT AND A PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY.
PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC PRIVATE EASEMENTS.
JUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE.
I GUESS I USED THE WRONG TERM, BUT IF I KNOW THAT THERE IS A DEEDED PLATTED EASEMENT ON A FIELD OR IN THE WOODS, I HAVE RIGHT TO GO ON THAT EASEMENT.
THAT'S CORRECT. IT'S BE A PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT.
MM HMM. AND IT PASSES ON TO SUCCESSORS, TO SUCCESSIVE PROPERTY OWNERS.
TO USE THAT FRACTURE [INAUDIBLE], BUT THERE'S NO PUBLIC EASEMENTS HERE.
WE'RE JUST DISCUSSING EVEN THE LAKE FARM ROAD IS JUST A PRIVATE EASEMENT.
SO BASICALLY, HE WOULD NEED TO WORK WITH GIS AND BASICALLY COMING UP WITH A NEW PROPERTY ADDRESS AND WORKING WITH THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ON A NEW PROPERTY ADDRESS FOR THIS BARN FACILITY AND IT WOULD NEED TO BE A LAKEFRONT ROAD ADDRESS, SO HE WOULD NEED A CHECK WITH THE GIS WITH THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ON CHANGING THE ADDRESS FOR 911 PURPOSES BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, WHEN YOU PUT IN THIS ADDRESS, IT DOES TAKE YOU THROUGH THE GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
OK, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. [INAUDIBLE]? WOULD CHANGE IN THE ADDRESS TO LAKE [INAUDIBLE] ADDRESS COMPLETELY, THEN REMOVE ANY USE OF A KING DRAFT ADDRESS AND LOCATION THAT ROAD OR CAUSE I KNOW CURRENTLY HE WAS ONLY PLANNING ON USING LAKE [INAUDIBLE] FOR THE ACTUAL EVENTS THEMSELVES AND PLAN TO CONTINUE USING KING DRIVE FOR DAILY USE OR FOR PEOPLE TO BE USED TO COME TO DO TOURS, ET CETERA. JUST CURIOUS AS TO HOW THAT WOULD IMPACT THAT.
ACTUALLY, MY MORE CONCERN TO ME IS IF I DON'T USE IT FOR AN EVENT, WHAT HAPPENED WHEN I CONVERT BACK TO A HOUSE, RIGHT?
[01:15:03]
AND BECAUSE THE CONDITION IS IF I DON'T USE OF A VENUE FOR FIVE YEARS, AUTOMATICALLY CHANGE THE APPLICATION.SURE. I MEAN, YOU WON'T BE LOSING YOUR EASEMENT.
YOU WOULD JUST BE. EVEN IF YOU CHANGE THE ADDRESS, YOU'RE NOT LOSING YOUR EASEMENT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY COMMENTS ON ZOOM? THE PUBLIC HEARING IS STILL OPEN.
YEAH, WE JUST HAD SOMEBODY JOIN.
SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ THE.
WELCOME TO THE PUBLIC HEARING SECTION OF TONIGHT'S MEETING FOR CASE SE2201 REQUEST OF DUNCAN AND SUSAN [INAUDIBLE] FOR AN ASSEMBLY HALL.
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE RECOGNIZED.
PRESS THE RAISE HAND BUTTON UNDER THE REACTIONS ON YOUR ZOOM SCREEN NOW.
OR ON YOUR PHONE SHOULD BE IN A SIMILAR PLACE.
OH, JUST A MOMENT I'M GOING TO HAVE TO SWITCH YOU.
OK, I BELIEVE WE CAN HEAR YOU NOW.
HI, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, THANK YOU.
I RESIDE WITH CLAYTON [INAUDIBLE] AND OUR SON WESTON.
WE'RE ON NINE ZERO NINE NINE FIVE GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
WE HAVE THE ROADWAY THAT RUNS ALL THE WAY TO THE PROPERTY THAT WILL BE HOLDING THE ASSEMBLY HALL. WE WERE TOLD ORIGINALLY THAT THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY SORT OF PROBLEM WITH USING THIS ROAD, JUST FOR THE INGRESS AND EGRESS, FOR JUST THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY OR WHOEVER RESIDES IN THAT DWELLING ON THIS PIECE OF LAND AND ON HIS PIECE OF LAND.
WE HAVE HAD MULTIPLE OCCASIONS.
IT WASN'T JUST HIS SON WEDDING.
THERE'S BEEN MULTIPLE OCCASIONS WHERE HE'S ALREADY USED OUR DRIVEWAY FOR THE MAIN ACCESS.
HIS ORIGINAL, HE HAD A WEDDING SIDE UP.
THE ORIGINAL WEDDING SITE WAS ADDRESSED NINE ZERO NINE NINE GOLF COURSE DRIVE.
THEY ALL CAME THROUGH OUR PROPERTY.
SO TO ME, IF THERE WAS ALREADY AN ACCESS WAY COMING FROM HIS DRIVEWAY, WHY DIDN'T HE INITIALLY START THERE? MY GUESS IS HE'S JUST SAYING THESE THINGS TO GET THE APPROVAL, BUT I GUARANTEE YOU ONCE THE APPROVAL COMES THROUGH ALL THEM CARS, JUST LIKE THE MANIPULATION BEFORE ALL THE CARS ARE GOING TO COME THROUGH OUR DRIVE AND IT'S GOING TO DISRUPT OUR COUNTRY LIFE THAT WE CHOSE FOR OUR CHILD AND US TO LIVE HERE AND HOW MANY CARS ARE GOING TO MISTAKENLY STILL COME DOWN THIS ROAD AND HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TURN IN OUR YARD AND JUST COMPLETELY DRAG UP THE FIELD? I KNOW IT'S IT MIGHT BE SELFISH JUST THINKING ABOUT US, BUT I MEAN, PRINCE GEORGE IS ALL OVER, JUST STARTING TO BECOME COMMERCIALIZED.
AND THAT'S JUST THAT'S NOT THE COUNTY WE MOVED INTO IN THE COUNTY WE LOVE.
AND WE'RE JUST WE'RE LITERALLY RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE PROPERTY.
IT LANDS OUR PROPERTY LINE AND ALL.
WE'RE GOING TO HEAR ALL THE WEDDING EVENTS GOING ON JUST LIKE WE DID HIS SON'S WEDDING AND THE PRECEDING WEDDING THAT HE HAD AFTER THAT.
IT'S JUST IT'S CAUSED IT'S BEEN NOTHING BUT CHAOS SINCE THE BEGINNING.
SO I JUST HOPE THAT PLEASE TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION THAT EVEN THOUGH THERE'S A PROPOSED PLAN TO GO DOWN LAKE [INAUDIBLE] DRIVE, THAT THE ODDS OF THAT ACTUALLY TRULY HAPPENING ARE, I FIND THAT HARD TO BELIEVE.
THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY ANYONE ELSE? NO, SIR, THERE'S NO ONE ELSE ON ZOOM.
THERE BEING NO ONE ELSE, I HEREBY CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TURN IT OVER TO THE COMMISSIONERS. MY FEELINGS ON THIS CASE IS UNTIL THIS DRIVEWAY ISSUE IS RESOLVED, I DON'T THINK IT SHOULD BE APPROVED.
[01:20:02]
OK, WELL, I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION TO LIKE BE. A MOTION TO POSTPONE WOULD BE THE PROPER LANGUAGE.DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO POSTPONE? [INAUDIBLE] SPECIFIC DATE TO IT'S THE NEXT MEETING.
SECOND BY MR. BROCKWELL, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
OK, THAT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK IN 60 DAYS.
[COMMUNICATIONS]
ALL RIGHT. I WILL PROVIDE SOME UPDATES HERE.ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, THERE WERE NO CASES OR NO APPLICATIONS RECEIVED.
SO THE FEBRUARY AND MARCH BOARD IS ZONING APPEALS MEETINGS WERE CANCELED.
AND REGARDING ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, YOU'VE GOT SOME RECAPS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU OF THE FEBRUARY 8TH AND THE FEBRUARY 22ND MEETING AND AT THE FEBRUARY 22ND MEETING, THE BOARD APPROVED THE REZONING REQUEST FOR THE TOWNHOUSE PROJECT FOR THE FIFTY ONE TOWNHOUSES ON PRINCE GEORGE DRIVE.
CURRENTLY, OUR TWO CASES ONE IS FOR A SOLAR FACILITY APPROXIMATELY 20 TO 40 ACRES LOCATED ON JAMES RIVER DRIVE, AND THE SECOND CASE SCHEDULED FOR MARCH IS AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE FACILITY.
STORAGE FACILITIES, I WILL ADD THAT AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE ORDINANCE, I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER COMMUNICATIONS.
YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
SO MOVED. MOTION BY MR. BROCKWELL, SECONDED BY MR. JOYNER, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
MEETING ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.